Frederick Rosen

1.4k citations
32 papers · 357 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Political Theory and Influence (8 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers)

In The Last Decade

Frederick Rosen

28 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Frederick Rosen
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Political Science and International Relations 153
  • Sociology and Political Science 99
  • Philosophy 94
  • Economics and Econometrics 51
  • History 43
Replace Eugene Garver with:
Eugene Garver United States
J. H. Burns United Kingdom
Hans Reiss United Kingdom
Lawrence Hamilton South Africa
Thomas L. Pangle Canada
Joseph Cropsey United States
Carnes Lord United States
Giles Gunn United States
Otfried Höffe Germany
Joseph W. Bendersky United States
Frederick Rosen relative to Eugene Garver United States Eugene Garver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Eugene Garver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Rosen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Rosen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Rosen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Rosen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Rosen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Rosen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Rosen. The network helps show where Frederick Rosen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Rosen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Rosen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Rosen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Rosen. Frederick Rosen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 16
2 2
3 71
4 2
5
Mill on Coleridge
2
6 1
7
Crime, punishment and liberty
3
8 23
9
Thinking about liberty
1
10 1
11
Lives, liberties, and the public good : new essays in political theory for Maurice Cranston
1
12 8
13 37
14
Bentham’s constitutional theory and the Greek Constitution of 1822
2
15 2
16 3
17 2
18 9
19
The collected works of Jeremy Bentham
101
20 6

About Frederick Rosen

Frederick Rosen is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theory and Influence (8 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (94 citations), Political Science and International Relations (153 citations) and History (43 citations). Frederick Rosen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include J. H. Burns, Philip Schofield, Jeremy Bentham, Gerald J. Postema, D. L. LeMahieu, John Morrow, Jeremy Jennings, John E. Toews, Douglas Moggach and James P. Young. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Philosophical Review and Political Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026