Daniel Pick

2.2k citations
25 papers · 788 indexed · h-index 10

Daniel Pick

19 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers

Daniel Pick
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • History 249
  • General Psychology 26
  • History and Philosophy of Science 67
  • Literature and Literary Theory 88
  • Sociology and Political Science 321
Replace Georges Didi‐Huberman with:
Georges Didi‐Huberman France
Ludmilla Jordanova United Kingdom
Marcel Gauchet France
Janet Oppenheim United States
Robert A. Nye United States
Henry Friedlander United States
Jean Starobinski Switzerland
Geoffrey J. Giles United States
Barbara Maria Stafford United States
Carl E. Schorske United States
Daniel Pick relative to Georges Didi‐Huberman France Georges Didi‐Huberman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Georges Didi‐Huberman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pick. The network helps show where Daniel Pick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pick Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20211
2 20178
3 20160
4
Psychoanalysis: A Very Short Introduction
20150
5 20150
6 201412
7 201116
8 20082
9 200037
10 20004
11 199925
12 19957
13 199454
14
Faces of degeneration: a European disorder, c.1848–1918
1993279
15 199312
16
The degenerating genius
19921
17 19910
18 1989285
19 198811
20 198622

About Daniel Pick

Daniel Pick is a scholar working on General Psychology, History, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 25 papers that have together received 788 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (4 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), European Political History Analysis (1 paper) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (249 citations), General Psychology (26 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (67 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (88 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (321 citations). Daniel Pick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James J. Schneider, Catharine Edwards, Mark Antliff, Catherine Hall, Lyndal Roper, John Morrow, Giuseppina Sannino, Jeremy Jennings, John E. Toews and Carlos Bazán. Their work appears in journals such as History Workshop Journal, The American Historical Review, History of the Human Sciences, Pharmacogenomics and The International Journal of Psychoanalysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026