Modern Intellectual History

585 papers and 2.0k indexed citations

About

The 585 papers published in Modern Intellectual History in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Modern Intellectual History usually cover Political Science and International Relations (272 papers), Sociology and Political Science (250 papers) and History (197 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (107 papers), Political Theory and Influence (79 papers) and European Political History Analysis (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Intellectual History are Ian Hunter, Robert Darnton, Michael C. Behrent, Joel Isaac, C. A. Bayly, Shruti Kapila, J. G. A. Pocock, Paul Warde, James Chappel and Angus Burgin.

In The Last Decade

Modern Intellectual History

393 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Modern Intellectual History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Intellectual History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Intellectual History.

Countries where authors publish in Modern Intellectual History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Intellectual History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Intellectual History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Intellectual History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026