Countries where authors publish in Modern Intellectual History
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Intellectual History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Intellectual History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Intellectual History more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Modern Intellectual History
This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Intellectual History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Intellectual History.
About Modern Intellectual History
The 587 papers published in Modern Intellectual History in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Modern Intellectual History usually cover History (197 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (76 papers), Philosophy (130 papers), Political Science and International Relations (271 papers) and General Psychology (10 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (107 papers), Political Theory and Influence (77 papers), European Political History Analysis (61 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (40 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (38 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (34 papers), Race, History, and American Society (31 papers) and Philosophy, History, and Historiography (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Intellectual History are Robert Darnton, Ian Hunter, Michael C. Behrent, Joel Isaac, C. A. Bayly, Shruti Kapila, J. G. A. Pocock, Paul Warde, James Chappel and Daniel Immerwahr.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.