Anne Tedeschi
Impact in
- History top 0.2%
- Biographical and Historical Analysis
- Philosophy, History, and Historiography
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Anthropology top 2%
- Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Philippine History and Culture
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade
Papers in
- History 4
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 4
-
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 2
- Co-authors
- Carlo Ginzburg (9 shared papers)John Tedeschi (10 shared papers)Samuel Cohn (1 shared paper)Jonathan L. Pearl (1 shared paper)Alex Keller (1 shared paper)David Herlihy (1 shared paper)Brian P. Levacκ (1 shared paper)Antonio Rotondò (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (3 papers)Technology and Culture (2 papers)Critical Inquiry (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Renaissance and Reformation (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Anne Tedeschi
11 papers receiving 578 citations
Anne Tedeschi's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- History 244
- Anthropology 203
- Classics 48
- History and Philosophy of Science 53
- Literature and Literary Theory 115
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Tedeschi
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Tedeschi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Tedeschi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Tedeschi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Tedeschi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Tedeschi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Tedeschi. The network helps show where Anne Tedeschi may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Anne Tedeschi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 235 | |
| 2 | The Cheese and the Worms. The Cosmos of a Sixteenth Century Miller Hit paper breakdown → | 1969 | 224 |
| 3 | 1993 | 189 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 105 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 66 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1969 | 28 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 10 | Book Displays: A Library Exhibits Handbook | 1997 | 3 |
| 11 | Calvin and the Italian anti-Trinitarians | 1968 | 1 |
About Anne Tedeschi
Anne Tedeschi is a scholar working on History, Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 905 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (244 citations), Anthropology (203 citations), Classics (48 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (53 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (115 citations). Anne Tedeschi has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Carlo Ginzburg, John Tedeschi, Samuel Cohn, Jonathan L. Pearl, Alex Keller, David Herlihy, Brian P. Levacκ and Antonio Rotondò. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Technology and Culture, Critical Inquiry, The American Historical Review and Renaissance and Reformation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.