Robert V. Wells
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Demography top 5%
- Family Dynamics and Relationships
Papers in
-
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment 3
- History 6
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 4
- Co-authors
- David E. StannardPeter H. LindertT. H. HollingsworthJanice HumeMichael ZuckermanJohn DemosSusan WatkinsRoger Schofield
- Journals
- Journal of American History (11 papers)The American Historical Review (8 papers)The William and Mary Quarterly (8 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (6 papers)Population Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Robert V. Wells
41 papers receiving 416 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Gender Studies 126
- Demography 92
- Anthropology 68
- History 72
- Geography, Planning and Development 37
Countries citing papers authored by Robert V. Wells
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert V. Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert V. Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert V. Wells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert V. Wells
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert V. Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert V. Wells. The network helps show where Robert V. Wells may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert V. Wells, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 22 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 29 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1981 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1978 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1976 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1974 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1972 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1971 | 37 |
About Robert V. Wells
Robert V. Wells is a scholar working on Religious studies, History, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies and Anthropology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (15 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (4 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (3 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (126 citations), Demography (92 citations), Anthropology (68 citations), History (72 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (37 citations). Robert V. Wells has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David E. Stannard, Peter H. Lindert, T. H. Hollingsworth, Janice Hume, Michael Zuckerman, John Demos, Susan Watkins, Roger Schofield, Gary Laderman and Thomas E. Burke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, The William and Mary Quarterly, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Population Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.