Lois W. Banner
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- History top 0.2%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Co-authors
- Anne Firor ScottMary S. HartmanKathryn Kish SklarCarl N. DeglerSusan WareValerie SteeleDavid J. PivarNancy A. Hewitt
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (13 papers)Race, History, and American Society (7 papers)American History and Culture (4 papers)
- Cited by
- MuseologyGender StudiesHistory
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Lois W. Banner
49 papers receiving 726 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Sociology and Political Science 513
- History 245
- Gender Studies 232
- Political Science and International Relations 178
- Marketing 144
Countries citing papers authored by Lois W. Banner
This map shows the geographic impact of Lois W. Banner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lois W. Banner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lois W. Banner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lois W. Banner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lois W. Banner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lois W. Banner. The network helps show where Lois W. Banner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lois W. Banner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lois W. Banner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lois W. Banner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lois W. Banner. Lois W. Banner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Ruth Benedict : a humanist in anthropology | 2 |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 106 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Women in Modern America: A Brief History | 36 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Lois W. Banner
Lois W. Banner is a scholar working on General Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (13 papers), Race, History, and American Society (7 papers) and American History and Culture (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (101 citations), Gender Studies (232 citations) and History (245 citations). Lois W. Banner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Anne Firor Scott, Mary S. Hartman, Kathryn Kish Sklar, Carl N. Degler, Susan Ware, Valerie Steele, David J. Pivar, Nancy A. Hewitt, Suzanne Lebsock and Donald Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.