Anya Jabour
- History top 5%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 7
-
- American History and Culture 4
- Conservation top 10%
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 8
- European history and politics 2
-
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 6
- Race, History, and American Society 5
-
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 1
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 1
- Cited by
- HistoryMarketingConservation
- Journals
- Journal of the Early Republic (5 papers)Journal of American History (3 papers)The Journal of Southern History (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Anya Jabour
19 papers receiving 58 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- History 45
- Marketing 37
- Conservation 8
- Public Administration 8
- Political Science and International Relations 50
Countries citing papers authored by Anya Jabour
This map shows the geographic impact of Anya Jabour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anya Jabour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anya Jabour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anya Jabour
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anya Jabour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anya Jabour. The network helps show where Anya Jabour may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Anya Jabour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 5 | Topsy-Turvy: How the Civil War Turned the World Upside Down for Southern Children | 2010 | 2 |
| 6 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 7 | Scarlett's Sisters: Young Women in the Old South | 2007 | 8 |
| 8 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 9 | Major Problems in the History of American Families and Children: Documents and Essays | 2004 | 1 |
| 10 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 41 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 2 |
About Anya Jabour
Anya Jabour is a scholar working on History, Marketing, Political Science and International Relations, Conservation and Public Administration, having authored 24 papers that have together received 139 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (7 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (6 papers), Race, History, and American Society (5 papers), American History and Culture (4 papers), European history and politics (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (1 paper) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (45 citations), Marketing (37 citations), Conservation (8 citations), Public Administration (8 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (50 citations). Anya Jabour has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nancy Isenberg, Glenna Matthews, C. Dallett Hemphill and John Demos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Early Republic, Journal of American History, The Journal of Southern History, The American Historical Review and The William and Mary Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.