Jonathan Lear

4.8k citations
67 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 19

Jonathan Lear

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jonathan Lear
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Philosophy 675
  • General Psychology 71
  • Theoretical Computer Science 28
  • History and Philosophy of Science 111
  • Clinical Psychology 357
Replace John Cottingham with:
John Cottingham United Kingdom
Lewis White Beck United States
Wilhelm Dilthey
Julia Annas United States
Anthony Kenny United States
Allen W. Wood United States
Wolfe Mays United Kingdom
Cora Diamond United States
Jean Paul Sartre
Stanley Cavell United States
Jonathan Lear relative to John Cottingham United Kingdom John Cottingham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
John Cottingham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Lear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Lear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Lear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Lear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Lear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Lear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Lear. The network helps show where Jonathan Lear may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Lear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Lear Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Lear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20213
3 20192
4 20190
5 20150
6 201152
7 20079
8
Turkey and the Armenians
20060
9 20041
10 20048
11 20020
12
Plato's Republic: Critical Essays
19978
13 199617
14 19930
15
Love and its place in nature : philosophical interpretation of Freudian psychoanalysis
199260
16 19916
17
Love and Its Place in Nature
199056
18 19840
19 19827
20 19793

About Jonathan Lear

Jonathan Lear is a scholar working on Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and Cultural Studies, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (11 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (3 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (675 citations), General Psychology (71 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (28 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (111 citations) and Clinical Psychology (357 citations). Jonathan Lear has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard Kraut, Marcia Cavell, Ian Mueller, Barry Stroud, Lawrence P. Schrenk, John Corcoran, Richard L. Purtill, Gregory Vlastos, Julia Annas and David Sachs. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, The Journal of Philosophy, Phronesis, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026