Robert Stoothoff

1.2k citations
20 papers · 386 indexed · h-index 11

Robert Stoothoff

20 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Robert Stoothoff
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • History and Philosophy of Science 153
  • Theoretical Computer Science 23
  • Philosophy 164
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 136
  • General Psychology 8
Replace Benson Mates with:
Benson Mates United States
Peter Remnant Canada
Willis Doney United Kingdom
David Pears United Kingdom
Antoine Arnauld
Leonard Linsky United States
Michael Beaney United Kingdom
Gottfried Gabriel Germany
David Bostock United Kingdom
Reinhardt Grossmann United States
Robert Stoothoff relative to Benson Mates United States Benson Mates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Benson Mates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stoothoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stoothoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stoothoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stoothoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stoothoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stoothoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stoothoff. The network helps show where Robert Stoothoff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stoothoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Stoothoff Line = papers co-authored together Robert Stoothoff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
The Philosophical Writings of Descartes Vol. Iii: The Correspondence
199134
2
The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 3, The Correspondence
199143
3 199068
4 19891
5 197623
6 197314
7 19712
8 197141
9 19707
10 196810
11
The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 1
196724
12 196714
13 196628
14 196667
15 19662
16 19662
17 19651
18 19641
19 19631
20 19633

About Robert Stoothoff

Robert Stoothoff is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Economics and Econometrics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 20 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (1 paper), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (153 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (23 citations), Philosophy (164 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (136 citations) and General Psychology (8 citations). Robert Stoothoff has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Dugald Murdoch, John Cottingham, Gottlob Frege, Montgomery Furth, Anthony Kenny, Paul F. Hoffman, Nicholas Rescher, John Carriero, P. F. Strawson and Hans Hermes. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Mind, Analysis, The Philosophical Review and Tijdschrift voor Philosophie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026