Julia Annas
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.1%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Anthropology top 1%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
Papers in
- Philosophy 55
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 47
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 8
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 5
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 3
- Co-authors
- Corey L. M. KeyesThomas C. BrickhouseJonathan BarnesRachel BarneySextus EmpiricusStephen WhiteChristopher RoweJ. D. G. Evans
- Journals
- The Philosophical Review (7 papers)Phronesis (6 papers)Apeiron (3 papers)Social Philosophy and Policy (3 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Julia Annas
90 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Philosophy 1.4k
- Anthropology 405
- History and Philosophy of Science 150
- Applied Psychology 172
- Cognitive Neuroscience 539
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Annas
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Annas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Annas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Annas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Annas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Annas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Annas. The network helps show where Julia Annas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Annas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 4 | Law in Plato’s Political Thought | 2012 | 0 |
| 5 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 7 | Hume and ancient scepticism | 2000 | 5 |
| 8 | Voices of ancient philosophy : an introductory reader | 2000 | 6 |
| 9 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 10 | Plato's Republic: Critical Essays | 1997 | 8 |
| 11 | Aristotle on Human Nature and Political Virtue | 1996 | 22 |
| 12 | 1995 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 21 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 27 | |
| 20 | 1976 | 8 |
About Julia Annas
Julia Annas is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies, Anthropology, Archeology and General Health Professions, having authored 98 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (47 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (6 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (1.4k citations), Anthropology (405 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (150 citations), Applied Psychology (172 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (539 citations). Julia Annas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Corey L. M. Keyes, Thomas C. Brickhouse, Jonathan Barnes, Rachel Barney, Sextus Empiricus, Jonathan Barnes, Stephen White, Christopher Rowe, J. D. G. Evans and Robert Grimm. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Phronesis, Apeiron, Social Philosophy and Policy and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.