Joël Pynte

2.5k citations
40 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Joël Pynte

40 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Joël Pynte
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 975
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 249
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 580
  • Language and Linguistics 211
Replace Tessa Warren with:
Tessa Warren United States
Adrian Staub United States
Barbara J. Juhasz United States
Susan D. Lima United States
Denis Drieghe United Kingdom
James I. Chumbley United States
Gary E. Raney United States
Raymond Bertram Finland
Jane Ashby United States
Timothy J. Slattery United Kingdom
Joël Pynte relative to Tessa Warren United States Tessa Warren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Tessa Warren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joël Pynte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joël Pynte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joël Pynte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joël Pynte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joël Pynte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joël Pynte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joël Pynte. The network helps show where Joël Pynte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Joël Pynte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joël Pynte Line = papers co-authored together Joël Pynte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004226
2 1984225
3 1996168
4 1997163
5 199685
6 199771
7 200264
8 201261
9 200358
10 200652
11 200245
12 199437
13 199632
14 200831
15 198726
16 197423
17 201322
18 200719
19 199619
20 199119

About Joël Pynte

Joël Pynte is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Language and Linguistics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (25 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (22 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (9 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (5 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (975 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (249 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (580 citations) and Language and Linguistics (211 citations). Joël Pynte has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Alan Kennedy, Cheryl Frenck‐Mestre, Stéphanie Ducrot, J. Kevin Ο’Regan, Mireille Besson, Daniel Zagar, Thierry Baccino, Boris New, Bernard Lété and Wayne S. Murray. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Brain and Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact