Vision Research

13.0k papers and 509.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.0k papers published in Vision Research in the last decades have received a total of 509.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Vision Research usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (9.6k papers), Molecular Biology (2.8k papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.6k papers) specifically the topics of Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8.8k papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3.0k papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (2.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Vision Research are Dennis M. Levi, Hugh R. Wilson, Marisa Carrasco, Gordon E. Legge, Robert F. Hess, Ken Nakayama, Eileen Kowler, Gerald Westheimer, Peter Hallett and Oliver Braddick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Vision Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Vision Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Vision Research.

Countries where authors publish in Vision Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Vision Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Vision Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vision Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025