Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Status-Based Model of Market Competition
19931.6k citationsJoel M. PodolnyAmerican Journal of Sociologyprofile →
Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market
20011.1k citationsJoel M. PodolnyAmerican Journal of Sociologyprofile →
Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange
1994976 citationsJoel M. PodolnyAdministrative Science Quarterlyprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Joel M. Podolny
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Joel M. Podolny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joel M. Podolny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joel M. Podolny more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joel M. Podolny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joel M. Podolny. The network helps show where Joel M. Podolny may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joel M. Podolny
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joel M. Podolny.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joel M. Podolny based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joel M. Podolny. Joel M. Podolny is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Baron, James N., Michael T. Hannan, Neil Fligstein, et al.. (2016). The Impact of Economics on Contemporary Sociology. Journal of Economic Literature. 32(3). 1111–1146.18 indexed citations
Podolny, Joel M.. (2010). Status Signals. Princeton University Press eBooks.31 indexed citations
5.
Bothner, Matthew S., Joel M. Podolny, & Edward B. Smith. (2010). Organizing Contests for Status: The Matthew Effect Versus the Mark Effect. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
6.
Podolny, Joel M.. (2009). La responsabilidad empieza y termina en las escuelas de negocios. Harvard business review. 87(6). 66–71.4 indexed citations
Stuart, Toby E. & Joel M. Podolny. (2007). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal. 17(S1). 21–38.773 indexed citations breakdown →
Podolny, Joel M., et al.. (2000). The Competitive Dynamics of Status and Niche Width: US Investment Banking, 1920-1949. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
Podolny, Joel M., et al.. (1999). Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly. 44(3). 563–589.563 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Podolny, Joel M., et al.. (1998). Network Forms of Organization. SSRN Electronic Journal.9 indexed citations
Podolny, Joel M., Mark Granovetter, Richard Swedberg, & Richard Swedberg. (1994). The Sociology of Economic Life.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 23(6). 868–868.53 indexed citations
18.
Podolny, Joel M.. (1993). A Status-Based Model of Market Competition. American Journal of Sociology. 98(4). 829–872.1585 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.