Joanne P. Lasker

544 total citations
21 papers, 429 citations indexed

About

Joanne P. Lasker is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joanne P. Lasker has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 429 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Occupational Therapy, 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 11 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Joanne P. Lasker's work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (16 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (11 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (7 papers). Joanne P. Lasker is often cited by papers focused on Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (16 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (11 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (7 papers). Joanne P. Lasker collaborates with scholars based in United States. Joanne P. Lasker's co-authors include Jan L. Bedrosian, Kathryn L. Garrett, Laura J. Ball, David R. Beukelman, Leonard L. LaPointe, Lisa Wood, Ellin Siegel-Causey, Jennifer Kent-Walsh, Miechelle McKelvey and Aimee Dietz and has published in prestigious journals such as Aphasiology, Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Topics in Language Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Joanne P. Lasker

20 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joanne P. Lasker United States 12 293 289 198 78 50 21 429
Kristy Weissling United States 10 311 1.1× 281 1.0× 141 0.7× 33 0.4× 53 1.1× 21 413
Donald R. Fuller United States 9 173 0.6× 247 0.9× 214 1.1× 44 0.6× 38 0.8× 20 398
Cynthia J. Cress United States 12 135 0.5× 208 0.7× 184 0.9× 218 2.8× 75 1.5× 40 402
Pamela Mathy United States 8 509 1.7× 191 0.7× 289 1.5× 301 3.9× 100 2.0× 12 638
Beth A. Mineo United States 6 223 0.8× 211 0.7× 141 0.7× 156 2.0× 55 1.1× 12 415
Ella Inglebret United States 6 114 0.4× 218 0.8× 88 0.4× 92 1.2× 48 1.0× 15 313
Jan L. Bedrosian United States 17 212 0.7× 403 1.4× 320 1.6× 153 2.0× 35 0.7× 34 614
Emily Gregori United States 12 337 1.2× 134 0.5× 274 1.4× 193 2.5× 77 1.5× 26 444
Natacha Trudeau Canada 18 264 0.9× 163 0.6× 652 3.3× 147 1.9× 46 0.9× 42 875
Gabriella Basili Italy 7 179 0.6× 116 0.4× 132 0.7× 83 1.1× 121 2.4× 9 319

Countries citing papers authored by Joanne P. Lasker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne P. Lasker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne P. Lasker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne P. Lasker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne P. Lasker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne P. Lasker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne P. Lasker. The network helps show where Joanne P. Lasker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanne P. Lasker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanne P. Lasker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanne P. Lasker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joanne P. Lasker. Joanne P. Lasker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Johnson, Rachel K., Joanne P. Lasker, Julie A. G. Stierwalt, Megan K. MacPherson, & Leonard L. LaPointe. (2017). Motor learning guided treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: a case study investigating factors that influence treatment outcomes. Speech Language and Hearing. 21(4). 213–223. 8 indexed citations
2.
Ball, Laura J. & Joanne P. Lasker. (2013). Teaching Partners to Support Communication for Adults with Acquired Communication Impairment. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 22(1). 4–15. 5 indexed citations
3.
Binger, Cathy, Laura J. Ball, Aimee Dietz, et al.. (2012). Personnel Roles in the AAC Assessment Process. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 28(4). 278–288. 70 indexed citations
4.
Lasker, Joanne P. & Kathryn L. Garrett. (2010). Construct Validity of the AAC-Aphasia Framework: Partner Dependent and Independent Communicators. The Aphasiology Archive (University of Pittsburgh). 1 indexed citations
5.
Lasker, Joanne P., et al.. (2010). Using Webcam Interactive Technology to Implement Treatment for Severe Apraxia: A Case Example. 18(4). 71–76. 21 indexed citations
6.
Lasker, Joanne P., Julie A. G. Stierwalt, Carlin F. Hageman, & Leonard L. LaPointe. (2008). Using motor learning guided theory and augmentative and alternative communication to improve speech production in profound apraxia: a case example. UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa). 16(4). 225–234. 15 indexed citations
7.
Lasker, Joanne P.. (2008). AAC Language Assessment: Considerations for Adults With Aphasia. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 17(3). 105–112. 2 indexed citations
8.
Lasker, Joanne P. & Kathryn L. Garrett. (2008). Aphasia and AAC: Enhancing Communication Across Health Care Settings. ASHA Leader. 13(8). 10–13. 6 indexed citations
9.
Garrett, Kathryn L. & Joanne P. Lasker. (2007). AAC and Severe Aphasia—Enhancing Communication Across the Continuum of Recovery. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders. 17(3). 6–15. 11 indexed citations
11.
Lasker, Joanne P., Leonard L. LaPointe, & Janet E. Kodras. (2005). Helping a professor with aphasia resume teaching through multimodal approaches. Aphasiology. 19(3-5). 399–410. 21 indexed citations
12.
Lasker, Joanne P.. (2004). Development of a Model AAC Syllabus: Exploring New Competencies. 7(1). 25–28.
13.
Lasker, Joanne P.. (2004). Development of a Model AAC Syllabus: Exploring New Competencies. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 13(2). 25–28. 1 indexed citations
14.
Ball, Laura J., et al.. (2003). Attitudes Toward Communication Modes and Message Formulation Techniques Used for Storytelling by People with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 19(3). 170–186. 12 indexed citations
15.
Bedrosian, Jan L., et al.. (2003). Enhancing the Written Narrative Skills of an AAC Student with Autism. Topics in Language Disorders. 23(4). 305–324. 33 indexed citations
16.
Lasker, Joanne P. & Jan L. Bedrosian. (2001). Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 17(3). 141–153. 63 indexed citations
17.
Lasker, Joanne P., et al.. (1999). Peers' perceptions of storytelling by an adult with aphasia. Aphasiology. 13(9-11). 857–869. 30 indexed citations
18.
Ball, Laura J., et al.. (1999). Generic talk use by preschool children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 15(3). 145–155. 15 indexed citations
19.
Wood, Lisa, Joanne P. Lasker, Ellin Siegel-Causey, David R. Beukelman, & Laura J. Ball. (1998). Input framework for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 14(4). 261–267. 48 indexed citations
20.
Lasker, Joanne P.. (1997). Effects of storytelling mode on partners' communicative ratings of an adult with aphasia. Insecta mundi. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026