Joan M. Finucci

560 total citations
10 papers, 429 citations indexed

About

Joan M. Finucci is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Human Factors and Ergonomics. According to data from OpenAlex, Joan M. Finucci has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 429 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 5 papers in Education and 2 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics. Recurrent topics in Joan M. Finucci's work include Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers). Joan M. Finucci is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers). Joan M. Finucci collaborates with scholars based in United States. Joan M. Finucci's co-authors include Barton Childs, Linda S. Gottfredson, Sarah D. Isaacs, John T. Guthrie, Helen Abbey, Malcolm S. Preston, Ann E. Pulver, Andrew Kertesz and Herman K. Goldberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Vocational Behavior, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology and Brain and Language.

In The Last Decade

Joan M. Finucci

10 papers receiving 381 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Joan M. Finucci United States	9	273	116	106	106	62	10	429
Sadie N. Decker United States	10	251 0.9×	97 0.8×	104 1.0×	96 0.9×	67 1.1×	14	361
Rachelle M. Bruno United States	4	418 1.5×	227 2.0×	125 1.2×	124 1.2×	47 0.8×	10	506
Celia Rosenquist United States	10	276 1.0×	133 1.1×	84 0.8×	58 0.5×	39 0.6×	12	412
Eleanor M. Semel United States	11	492 1.8×	217 1.9×	58 0.5×	114 1.1×	49 0.8×	16	661
Cherry K. Houck United States	7	389 1.4×	119 1.0×	112 1.1×	250 2.4×	28 0.5×	18	593
Bruno Façon France	15	225 0.8×	133 1.1×	44 0.4×	48 0.5×	100 1.6×	34	454
Anthony S. Bashir United States	11	360 1.3×	181 1.6×	50 0.5×	128 1.2×	39 0.6×	15	636
Barbara Culatta United States	11	361 1.3×	96 0.8×	57 0.5×	192 1.8×	26 0.4×	30	493
Peter Quain Australia	7	339 1.2×	71 0.6×	83 0.8×	210 2.0×	91 1.5×	8	421
Nina Neuhoff Germany	9	345 1.3×	166 1.4×	148 1.4×	130 1.2×	24 0.4×	11	501

Countries citing papers authored by Joan M. Finucci

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan M. Finucci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan M. Finucci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan M. Finucci more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan M. Finucci

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan M. Finucci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan M. Finucci. The network helps show where Joan M. Finucci may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan M. Finucci

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan M. Finucci. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan M. Finucci based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joan M. Finucci. Joan M. Finucci is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Finucci, Joan M., Linda S. Gottfredson, & Barton Childs. (1985). A follow-up study of dyslexic boys. Annals of Dyslexia. 35(1). 117–136. 63 indexed citations

2.

Finucci, Joan M., et al.. (1984). DERIVATION AND VALIDATION OF A QUANTITATIVE DEFINITION OF SPECIFIC READING DISABILITY FOR ADULTS. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 26(2). 143–153. 52 indexed citations

3.

Gottfredson, Linda S., Joan M. Finucci, & Barton Childs. (1984). Explaining the adult careers of dyslexic boys: Variations in critical skills for high-level jobs. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 24(3). 355–373. 21 indexed citations

4.

Finucci, Joan M., et al.. (1983). Classification of spelling errors and their relationship to reading ability, sex, grade placement, and intelligence. Brain and Language. 20(2). 340–355. 21 indexed citations

5.

Finucci, Joan M., et al.. (1982). Empirical Validation of Reading and Spelling Quotients. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 24(s45). 733–744. 33 indexed citations

6.

Kertesz, Andrew, Barton Childs, & Joan M. Finucci. (1981). Sex Differences in Dyslexia. 33 indexed citations

7.

Childs, Barton & Joan M. Finucci. (1979). The Genetics of Learning Disabilities. Novartis Foundation symposium. 359–376. 9 indexed citations

8.

Childs, Barton, Joan M. Finucci, Malcolm S. Preston, & Ann E. Pulver. (1976). Human Behavior Genetics. PubMed. 7. 57–97. 73 indexed citations

9.

Finucci, Joan M., et al.. (1976). The genetics of specific reading disability. Annals of Human Genetics. 40(1). 1–23. 120 indexed citations

10.

Guthrie, John T., Herman K. Goldberg, & Joan M. Finucci. (1971). Independence of Abilities in Disabled Readers. Journal of Reading Behavior. 4(2). 129–138. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact