Joan Cottrell

4.6k citations
94 papers · 2.2k indexed · h-index 27

Joan Cottrell

88 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Joan Cottrell
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 560
  • Ecological Modeling 139
  • Genetics 754
  • Plant Science 873
  • Insect Science 269
Replace Oliver Gailing with:
Oliver Gailing Germany
Catherine Bodénès France
Nathalie Isabel Canada
Alvin D. Yanchuk Canada
Selvadurai Dayanandan Canada
Francis C. Yeh Canada
Om P. Rajora Canada
Stephen Cavers United Kingdom
Glenn T. Howe United States
Erik Dahl Kjær Denmark
Joan Cottrell relative to Oliver Gailing Germany Oliver Gailing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Oliver Gailing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Cottrell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Cottrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Cottrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Cottrell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Cottrell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Cottrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Cottrell. The network helps show where Joan Cottrell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joan Cottrell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan Cottrell Line = papers co-authored together Joan Cottrell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20242
3 20231
4 20230
5 20225
6 202128
7 202112
8
Species diversification – which species should we use?
20203
9 201843
10 201718
11 201710
12 201714
13
Pine tree lappet moth (Dendrolimus pini) in Scotland: discovery, timber movement controls and assessment of risk.
20177
14 201628
15 201490
16 201039
17 201090
18 20093
19 200919
20 20013

About Joan Cottrell

Joan Cottrell is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecological Modeling, Insect Science and Genetics, having authored 94 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (27 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (17 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (13 papers), Forest ecology and management (12 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (10 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (560 citations), Ecological Modeling (139 citations), Genetics (754 citations), Plant Science (873 citations) and Insect Science (269 citations). Joan Cottrell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Cavers, Richard A. Ennos, Helen Tabbener, Andrew J. Lowe, R.C. Munro, G. I. Forrest, C. M. Duffus, G. R. Mackay, Antoine Kremer and J. E. DALE. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research, Ecology and Evolution, Tree Genetics & Genomes and Annals of Forest Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026