Louise Sing

418 total citations
11 papers, 198 citations indexed

About

Louise Sing is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Louise Sing has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 198 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 2 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Louise Sing's work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (6 papers), Forest Management and Policy (3 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (2 papers). Louise Sing is often cited by papers focused on Land Use and Ecosystem Services (6 papers), Forest Management and Policy (3 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (2 papers). Louise Sing collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovakia and Greece. Louise Sing's co-authors include James Paterson, Marc J. Metzger, Duncan Ray, Haydn J. D. Thomas, T. Connolly, W. Towers, James E. Ellis, Kevin Watts, Darren Moseley and Desika Moodley and has published in prestigious journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Heredity and Land Use Policy.

In The Last Decade

Louise Sing

10 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Louise Sing United Kingdom	7	143	51	39	33	18	11	198
Rafael B. Chaves Brazil	6	161 1.1×	75 1.5×	40 1.0×	30 0.9×	16 0.9×	11	230
A. Sofía Nanni Argentina	9	184 1.3×	70 1.4×	94 2.4×	14 0.4×	19 1.1×	19	270
Edson Santiami Brazil	3	109 0.8×	52 1.0×	35 0.9×	12 0.4×	22 1.2×	3	182
Rebekka Riebl Germany	8	65 0.5×	48 0.9×	35 0.9×	34 1.0×	58 3.2×	16	184
Ionuț Bărnoaiea Romania	6	149 1.0×	129 2.5×	44 1.1×	24 0.7×	17 0.9×	12	215
Carlos Ramirez‐Reyes United States	9	133 0.9×	48 0.9×	75 1.9×	11 0.3×	23 1.3×	11	233
Maria Haensel Germany	8	58 0.4×	41 0.8×	39 1.0×	34 1.0×	56 3.1×	19	180
Andrii Bilous Ukraine	9	161 1.1×	47 0.9×	95 2.4×	41 1.2×	10 0.6×	42	255
William Sidemo‐Holm Sweden	7	144 1.0×	32 0.6×	77 2.0×	17 0.5×	40 2.2×	9	268
F. Milano Argentina	4	99 0.7×	44 0.9×	58 1.5×	10 0.3×	20 1.1×	5	171

Countries citing papers authored by Louise Sing

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Louise Sing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise Sing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise Sing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Louise Sing

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise Sing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise Sing. The network helps show where Louise Sing may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louise Sing

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louise Sing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louise Sing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louise Sing. Louise Sing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Metzger, Marc J., et al.. (2021). A shared vision for sustainable regional land use in the Galloway and Ayrshire UNESCO Biosphere. ERA. 1 indexed citations

2.

Sing, Louise & Matt Aitkenhead. (2020). Analysis of Land Suitability for Woodland Expansion in Scotland: update 2020. ERA. 3 indexed citations

3.

Thomas, Haydn J. D., James Paterson, Marc J. Metzger, & Louise Sing. (2018). An evaluation of Scottish woodland grant schemes using site suitability modelling. Land Use Policy. 80. 309–317. 6 indexed citations

4.

Sing, Louise, Marc J. Metzger, James Paterson, & Duncan Ray. (2017). A review of the effects of forest management intensity on ecosystem services for northern European temperate forests with a focus on the UK. Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research. 91(2). 151–164. 70 indexed citations

5.

Moseley, Darren, T. Connolly, Louise Sing, & Kevin Watts. (2017). Developing an indicator for the physical health benefits of recreation in woodlands. Ecosystem Services. 31. 420–432. 18 indexed citations

6.

Sarkki, Simo, Mikko Jokinen, Maria Nijnik, et al.. (2016). Social equity in governance of ecosystem services: synthesis from European treeline areas. Climate Research. 73(1-2). 31–44. 17 indexed citations

7.

Sing, Louise, David Ray, & Kevin Watts. (2015). Ecosystem services and forest management.. 6 indexed citations

8.

Thomas, Haydn J. D., James Paterson, Marc J. Metzger, & Louise Sing. (2015). Towards a research agenda for woodland expansion in Scotland. Forest Ecology and Management. 349. 149–161. 35 indexed citations

9.

Sing, Louise, W. Towers, & James E. Ellis. (2013). Woodland expansion in Scotland: an assessment of the opportunities and constraints using GIS.. 67(4). 18–25. 20 indexed citations

10.

Cottrell, Joan, Simon P. Vaughan, T. Connolly, et al.. (2009). Contemporary pollen flow, characterization of the maternal ecological neighbourhood and mating patterns in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Heredity. 103(2). 118–128. 19 indexed citations

11.

Ray, Duncan, et al.. (2003). Native Woodland Habitat Networks in the Scottish Borders. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact