Laura L. Forrest
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Barbara Crandall‐StotlerDavid G. LongPeter M. HollingsworthMichelle L. HollingsworthMichelle HartR. Toby PenningtonRaymond E. StotlerRobyn S. Cowan
- Topics
- Bryophyte Studies and Records (30 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (26 papers)Lichen and fungal ecology (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Laura L. Forrest
53 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
- Plant Science 915
- Molecular Biology 739
- Genetics 296
- Ecology 238
Countries citing papers authored by Laura L. Forrest
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura L. Forrest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura L. Forrest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura L. Forrest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura L. Forrest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura L. Forrest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura L. Forrest. The network helps show where Laura L. Forrest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura L. Forrest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura L. Forrest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura L. Forrest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura L. Forrest. Laura L. Forrest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 90 | |
| 11 | The collection and storage of plant material for DNA extraction: The Teabag Method | 14 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | Progress towards a robust phylogeny for the liverworts, with particular focus on the simple thalloids | 40 |
| 19 | Progress towards a robust phylogeny for the liverworts, with particular focus on the simple thalloids (Selected Papers Presented at the 15 World Congress on Bryology Held at Merida, Venezuela, January 12-16, 2004) | 4 |
| 20 | 80 |
About Laura L. Forrest
Laura L. Forrest is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bryophyte Studies and Records (30 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (26 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations), Plant Science (915 citations) and Ecological Modeling (57 citations). Laura L. Forrest has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Crandall‐Stotler, David G. Long, Peter M. Hollingsworth, Michelle L. Hollingsworth, Michelle Hart, R. Toby Pennington, Raymond E. Stotler, Robyn S. Cowan, Myriam Gaudeul and Bernard Goffinet. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and New Phytologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.