Annals of Forest Science

2.2k papers and 57.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Annals of Forest Science in the last decades have received a total of 57.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Forest Science usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.3k papers), Global and Planetary Change (953 papers) and Plant Science (636 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (992 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (542 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (412 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Forest Science are Gilbert Aussenac, Erwin Dreyer, Nathalie Bréda, Rodney J. Keenan, Roland Huc, Laurent Augusto, Jacques J. Ranger, Hervé Cochard, Philippe Gérardin and François Lebourgeois.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Forest Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Forest Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Forest Science.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Forest Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Forest Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Forest Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Forest Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025