Forest Ecology and Management

17.6k papers and 619.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 17.6k papers published in Forest Ecology and Management in the last decades have received a total of 619.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Forest Ecology and Management usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (10.6k papers), Global and Planetary Change (9.2k papers) and Ecology (5.6k papers) specifically the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6.0k papers), Forest ecology and management (5.9k papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (3.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forest Ecology and Management are Laurence Roche, Dan Binkley, Richard F. Fisher, David I. Forrester, Hans Pretzsch, Philip M. Fearnside, P. M. Attiwill, Rattan Lal, Richard H. Waring and Scott L. Stephens.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forest Ecology and Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forest Ecology and Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forest Ecology and Management.

Countries where authors publish in Forest Ecology and Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forest Ecology and Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forest Ecology and Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forest Ecology and Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025