Richard A. Ennos
- Genetics top 0.2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.2%
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Cécile Fanny Emilie BaclesAlex D. TwyfordSarah Litman RendellAndrew J. LowePeter M. HollingsworthMichael T. CleggA. C. NewtonGiovanni G. Vendramin
- Topics
- Genetic diversity and population structure (50 papers)Plant and animal studies (32 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (32 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape ConservationEcological Modeling
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Richard A. Ennos
135 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Genetics 3.3k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.9k
- Plant Science 2.4k
- Molecular Biology 1.7k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.7k
Countries citing papers authored by Richard A. Ennos
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard A. Ennos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard A. Ennos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard A. Ennos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard A. Ennos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard A. Ennos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard A. Ennos. The network helps show where Richard A. Ennos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard A. Ennos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard A. Ennos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard A. Ennos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard A. Ennos. Richard A. Ennos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | Species diversification – which species should we use? | 3 |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 43 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 66 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Richard A. Ennos
Richard A. Ennos is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Genetics, having authored 140 papers that have together received 6.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (50 papers), Plant and animal studies (32 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.9k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.7k citations) and Ecological Modeling (559 citations). Richard A. Ennos has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cécile Fanny Emilie Bacles, Alex D. Twyford, Sarah Litman Rendell, Andrew J. Lowe, Peter M. Hollingsworth, Michael T. Clegg, A. C. Newton, Giovanni G. Vendramin, Jacques‐Louis de Beaulieu and Martin Lascoux. Their work appears in journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.