Jo Dicks
Impact in
- Plant Science top 10%
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 11
- Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 5
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 4
- Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Ian N. Roberts (16 shared papers)Graham Etherington (4 shared papers)Jehanzeb Cheema (2 shared papers)Adam Elliston (5 shared papers)Anne Osbourn (2 shared papers)Stephen A. James (5 shared papers)Keith W. Waldron (4 shared papers)Dan Liu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Bioinformatics (5 papers)Biotechnology for Biofuels (3 papers)Yeast (2 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)New Phytologist (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jo Dicks
35 papers receiving 827 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Plant Science 339
- Infectious Diseases 119
- Genetics 166
- Molecular Biology 407
- Endocrinology 24
Countries citing papers authored by Jo Dicks
This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Dicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Dicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Dicks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Dicks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Dicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Dicks. The network helps show where Jo Dicks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo Dicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 130 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 93 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 11 |
About Jo Dicks
Jo Dicks is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Plant Science, Genetics and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 36 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (11 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (5 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (4 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (4 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (4 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (4 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (3 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (339 citations), Infectious Diseases (119 citations), Genetics (166 citations), Molecular Biology (407 citations) and Endocrinology (24 citations). Jo Dicks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian N. Roberts, Graham Etherington, Jehanzeb Cheema, Adam Elliston, Anne Osbourn, Stephen A. James, Keith W. Waldron, Dan Liu, Song Ge and Paul E. O’Maille. Their work appears in journals such as Bioinformatics, Biotechnology for Biofuels, Yeast, Scientific Reports and New Phytologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.