Yeast
About
In The Last Decade
Yeast
3.4k papers receiving 122.1k citations
Fields of papers published in Yeast
This network shows the impact of papers published in Yeast. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Yeast.
Countries where authors publish in Yeast
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Yeast. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Yeast with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yeast more than expected).
- Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (1998)
- Designer deletion strains derived fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications (1998)
- New heterologous modules for classical or PCR‐based gene disruptions in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> (1994)
- Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting inSchizosaccharomyces pombe (1998)
- Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS‐DNA/PEG procedure (1995)
- A versatile toolbox for PCR‐based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes (2004)
- Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption inSaccharomyces cerevisiae (1999)
- Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: A continuous‐culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation (1992)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.