Jonathan Wright
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 7
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology 6
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 3
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 2
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 2
-
- Plant Reproductive Biology 4
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration 3
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- Bernardo Clavijo (3 shared papers)Daniel Mapleson (1 shared paper)George Kettleborough (1 shared paper)Gonzalo Garcia Accinelli (1 shared paper)Philip M. Gilmartin (4 shared papers)Jonathan M. Cocker (4 shared papers)David Swarbreck (3 shared papers)Michael Bevan (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Genome (2 papers)New Phytologist (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)BMC Genomics (1 paper)Bioinformatics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Wright
13 papers receiving 796 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Plant Science 517
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 196
- Genetics 187
- Molecular Biology 455
- Horticulture 6
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Wright. The network helps show where Jonathan Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 308 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 125 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 8 |
About Jonathan Wright
Jonathan Wright is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 13 papers that have together received 797 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (7 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (6 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (4 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (3 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (2 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (517 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (196 citations), Genetics (187 citations), Molecular Biology (455 citations) and Horticulture (6 citations). Jonathan Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Bernardo Clavijo, Daniel Mapleson, George Kettleborough, Gonzalo Garcia Accinelli, Philip M. Gilmartin, Jonathan M. Cocker, David Swarbreck, Michael Bevan, Mario Cáccamo and Sarah Dyer. Their work appears in journals such as Genome, New Phytologist, Scientific Reports, BMC Genomics and Bioinformatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.