Julie E. Russell

632 total citations
24 papers, 352 citations indexed

About

Julie E. Russell is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry and Endocrinology. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie E. Russell has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 352 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Clinical Biochemistry and 7 papers in Endocrinology. Recurrent topics in Julie E. Russell's work include Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (8 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (5 papers) and Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research (4 papers). Julie E. Russell is often cited by papers focused on Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (8 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (5 papers) and Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research (4 papers). Julie E. Russell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Netherlands. Julie E. Russell's co-authors include Julian Parkhill, Sandra Reuter, Kathy E. Raven, Rosy Reynolds, M. Estée Török, Sharon J. Peacock, Sarah Alexander, Hayley J. Brodrick, Nicholas R. Thomson and Theodore Gouliouris and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Scientific Reports and Journal of Bacteriology.

In The Last Decade

Julie E. Russell

24 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julie E. Russell United Kingdom 10 161 131 111 70 67 24 352
Norman Mauder Germany 14 125 0.8× 119 0.9× 97 0.9× 49 0.7× 97 1.4× 20 495
Teresa Pires dos Santos Denmark 7 134 0.8× 129 1.0× 64 0.6× 100 1.4× 108 1.6× 8 315
Jessin Janice Norway 12 142 0.9× 164 1.3× 70 0.6× 138 2.0× 94 1.4× 30 436
Pavel Sauer Czechia 12 217 1.3× 223 1.7× 80 0.7× 101 1.4× 65 1.0× 30 532
Ewa Szczuka Poland 13 205 1.3× 208 1.6× 73 0.7× 34 0.5× 58 0.9× 29 413
Guilhem Royer France 14 93 0.6× 164 1.3× 85 0.8× 153 2.2× 136 2.0× 30 439
Bingshao Liang China 11 119 0.7× 110 0.8× 53 0.5× 54 0.8× 61 0.9× 29 287
Margarida Sousa Portugal 14 116 0.7× 111 0.8× 52 0.5× 145 2.1× 55 0.8× 24 373
Rikke Lykke Poulsen Denmark 7 196 1.2× 76 0.6× 103 0.9× 100 1.4× 31 0.5× 8 355
Chiara Catavitello Italy 10 131 0.8× 133 1.0× 75 0.7× 34 0.5× 125 1.9× 18 386

Countries citing papers authored by Julie E. Russell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie E. Russell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie E. Russell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie E. Russell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie E. Russell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie E. Russell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie E. Russell. The network helps show where Julie E. Russell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie E. Russell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie E. Russell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie E. Russell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie E. Russell. Julie E. Russell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Salvà‐Serra, Francisco, Daniel Jaén‐Luchoro, Hedvig E. Jakobsson, et al.. (2020). Complete genome sequences of Streptococcus pyogenes type strain reveal 100%-match between PacBio-solo and Illumina-Oxford Nanopore hybrid assemblies. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 11656–11656. 29 indexed citations
4.
Russell, Julie E., Nicholas Grayson, Karen Oliver, et al.. (2019). Whole-Genome Sequences of Five Strains of Kocuria rosea, NCTC2676, NCTC7514, NCTC7512, NCTC7528, and NCTC7511. Microbiology Resource Announcements. 8(44). 5 indexed citations
5.
Yokoya, Kazutomo, et al.. (2019). National collection of type cultures: the bacteriophage and plasmid collections and repositories. Access Microbiology. 1(1A). 1 indexed citations
6.
Dorman, Matthew J., Leanne Kane, Daryl Domman, et al.. (2019). The history, genome and biology of NCTC 30: a non-pandemic Vibrio cholerae isolate from World War One. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 286(1900). 20182025–20182025. 16 indexed citations
7.
Alexander, Sarah, Nicholas Grayson, Karen Oliver, et al.. (2019). Complete Whole-Genome Sequence of Haemophilus haemolyticus NCTC 10839. Microbiology Resource Announcements. 8(25). 1 indexed citations
8.
Cole, Kevin, Dona Foster, Julie E. Russell, et al.. (2019). Draft Genome Sequences of 64 Type Strains of 50 Species and 25 Subspecies of the Genus Staphylococcus Rosenbach 1884. Microbiology Resource Announcements. 8(17). 6 indexed citations
9.
Couto, Jillian M., et al.. (2018). The effect of metabolic stress on genome stability of a synthetic biology chassis Escherichia coli K12 strain. Microbial Cell Factories. 17(1). 8–8. 21 indexed citations
10.
Raven, Kathy E., Sandra Reuter, Theodore Gouliouris, et al.. (2016). Genome-based characterization of hospital-adapted Enterococcus faecalis lineages. Nature Microbiology. 1(3). 15033–15033. 57 indexed citations
11.
Raven, Kathy E., Sandra Reuter, Rosy Reynolds, et al.. (2016). A decade of genomic history for healthcare-associated Enterococcus faecium in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Genome Research. 26(10). 1388–1396. 83 indexed citations
12.
Baker, Kate S., Edward Burnett, Christine J. Boinett, et al.. (2015). The Murray collection of pre-antibiotic era Enterobacteriacae: a unique research resource. Genome Medicine. 7(1). 97–97. 30 indexed citations
13.
Mather, Alison E., Kate S. Baker, Paul Coupland, et al.. (2014). Bacillary dysentery from World War 1 and NCTC1, the first bacterial isolate in the National Collection. The Lancet. 384(9955). 1720–1720. 13 indexed citations
14.
Baker, Kate S., Alison E. Mather, Paul Coupland, et al.. (2014). The extant World War 1 dysentery bacillus NCTC1: a genomic analysis. The Lancet. 384(9955). 1691–1697. 23 indexed citations
16.
Hartnell, Rachel, et al.. (2011). The development of LENTICULES™ as reference materials for noroviruses. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 112(2). 338–345. 6 indexed citations
17.
Shah, Haroun N., et al.. (2008). Assessment of the stability of cell-surface components of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF-MS following preservation on lenticule discs. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 285(2). 284–290. 1 indexed citations
18.
Desai, Meeta, Julie E. Russell, & Saheer E. Gharbia. (2006). Genetic stability of strains preserved on LENTICULE discs and by freeze-drying: a comparison using fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 257(1). 158–162. 5 indexed citations
19.
Russell, Julie E., et al.. (2005). LENTICULE discs provide a homogenous format for external quality assessment samples: a comparison with freeze-dried samples for shellfish microbiology. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 41(4). 334–340. 4 indexed citations
20.
Russell, Julie E., et al.. (1994). Bioluminescent Salmonella typhimurium provides a rapid assay for measuring the efficacy of freeze-drying suspension media. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 19(6). 419–422. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026