Luzie U. Wingen
- Plant Science top 1%
- Genetics top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 2%
- Hematology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Simon GriffithsSimon OrfordJames SimmondsJ. W. SnapeHans KreipeMeluleki ZikhaliLesley FishLiz Sayers
- Topics
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (34 papers)Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (24 papers)Genetics and Plant Breeding (23 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyMexico
In The Last Decade
Luzie U. Wingen
50 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Plant Science 1.5k
- Genetics 721
- Molecular Biology 517
- Agronomy and Crop Science 374
- Hematology 95
Countries citing papers authored by Luzie U. Wingen
This map shows the geographic impact of Luzie U. Wingen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luzie U. Wingen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luzie U. Wingen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luzie U. Wingen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luzie U. Wingen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luzie U. Wingen. The network helps show where Luzie U. Wingen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luzie U. Wingen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luzie U. Wingen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luzie U. Wingen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luzie U. Wingen. Luzie U. Wingen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 166 | |
| 17 | Genetic improvement for increased nitrogen use efficiency in wheat. | 9 |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | Maize MADS-Box Genes Galore | 57 |
About Luzie U. Wingen
Luzie U. Wingen is a scholar working on Plant Science, Genetics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (34 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (24 papers) and Genetics and Plant Breeding (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.5k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (374 citations) and Genetics (721 citations). Luzie U. Wingen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Simon Griffiths, Simon Orford, James Simmonds, J. W. Snape, Hans Kreipe, Meluleki Zikhali, Lesley Fish, Liz Sayers, Michelle Leverington‐Waite and Brigitte Schlegelberger. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.