Jeannie Wright

698 citations
30 papers · 435 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jeannie Wright

27 papers receiving 383 citations

Peers

Jeannie Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Conservation 64
  • Applied Psychology 65
  • Social Psychology 183
  • Clinical Psychology 162
  • Public Administration 18
Replace Ernesto Spinelli with:
Ernesto Spinelli United Kingdom
Thelma Duffey United States
Garrett J. McAuliffe United States
Kathy Evans United States
Gerald Parr United States
Oren Ergas Israel
Hongryun Woo United States
Diego Romaioli Italy
Gerald Monk United States
David Wallace United States
Jeannie Wright relative to Ernesto Spinelli United Kingdom Ernesto Spinelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Ernesto Spinelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeannie Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeannie Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeannie Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeannie Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeannie Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeannie Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeannie Wright. The network helps show where Jeannie Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jeannie Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeannie Wright Line = papers co-authored together Jeannie Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200188
2
Writing Cures: An Introductory Handbook of Writing in Counselling and Therapy
200459
3 201156
4 200254
5 200736
6 200825
7 201018
8 200715
9 201810
10 20059
11 20118
12 20058
13 20187
14 20097
15 20036
16 20206
17 20035
18
Conversations about Indigenous Counselling and Psychotherapy
20073
19 20092
20 20182

About Jeannie Wright

Jeannie Wright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Conservation, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (11 papers), Mental Health via Writing (7 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (7 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (64 citations), Applied Psychology (65 citations), Social Psychology (183 citations), Clinical Psychology (162 citations) and Public Administration (18 citations). Jeannie Wright has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Man Cheung Chung, Liz Sutton, Michael Townend, Cat Pausé, Seth Brown, Frances Griffiths, Ravi K. Thiara, Sue Cornforth, Elizabeth Harrison and Jonathan Wyatt. Their work appears in journals such as Reflective Practice, Qualitative Inquiry, Emotion, space and society, Counselling Psychology Quarterly and Higher Education Research & Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact