Janet Scammell

971 citations
65 papers · 651 indexed · h-index 15

Janet Scammell

63 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

Janet Scammell
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Research and Theory 132
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 25
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 82
  • Leadership and Management 19
  • General Health Professions 352
Replace Karin Hallin with:
Karin Hallin Sweden
Florence Luhanga Canada
Maj‐Britt Råholm Norway
Jayne Cohen United States
Bridie McCarthy Ireland
Georgina Willetts Australia
Jane M. Georges United States
Vicki D. Lachman United States
John Playle United Kingdom
Marie Alderson Canada
Janet Scammell relative to Karin Hallin Sweden Karin Hallin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Karin Hallin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Scammell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Scammell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Scammell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Scammell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Scammell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Scammell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Scammell. The network helps show where Janet Scammell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Scammell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Scammell Line = papers co-authored together Janet Scammell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 202211
3 202125
4 202117
5 202125
6 202033
7 201918
8 20177
9 201710
10
Humanising midwifery care.
20163
11 201521
12
Midwives caring for asylum-seeking women: research findings.
20149
13
Humanising nursing care: a theoretical model.
201311
14
Humanising values at the heart of nurse education.
20138
15 201156
16 201126
17 20102
18 200837
19 200211
20 19992

About Janet Scammell

Janet Scammell is a scholar working on Research and Theory, General Health Professions and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (14 papers), Nursing education and management (13 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (7 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (7 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (132 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (25 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (82 citations). Janet Scammell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Vanessa Heaslip, Stephen Tee, Maggie Hutchings, Sam Porter, Michael D. Martin, Andy Pulman, Ann Hemingway, Sara J. White, Kirsten Jack and Monica Bianchi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026