Janet Scammell
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Research and Theory top 1%
- Clinical Psychology
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Vanessa HeaslipStephen TeeMaggie HutchingsSam PorterMichael D. MartinAndy PulmanAnn HemingwaySara J. White
- Topics
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (14 papers)Nursing education and management (13 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Advanced NursingInternational Journal of Nursing StudiesJournal of Clinical Nursing
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPortugalSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Janet Scammell
63 papers receiving 608 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- General Health Professions 352
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 209
- Research and Theory 132
- Clinical Psychology 105
- Education 98
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Scammell
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Scammell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Scammell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Scammell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Scammell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Scammell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Scammell. The network helps show where Janet Scammell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Scammell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Scammell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Scammell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Scammell. Janet Scammell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | Humanising midwifery care. | 3 |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | Midwives caring for asylum-seeking women: research findings. | 9 |
| 13 | Humanising nursing care: a theoretical model. | 11 |
| 14 | Humanising values at the heart of nurse education. | 8 |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Janet Scammell
Janet Scammell is a scholar working on Research and Theory, General Health Professions and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (14 papers), Nursing education and management (13 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (132 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (25 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (82 citations). Janet Scammell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Vanessa Heaslip, Stephen Tee, Maggie Hutchings, Sam Porter, Michael D. Martin, Andy Pulman, Ann Hemingway, Sara J. White, Kirsten Jack and Monica Bianchi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Journal of Clinical Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.