Kate Frazer
- Research and Theory top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation 12
-
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 7
-
- Homelessness and Social Issues 6
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 6
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 6
-
- Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units 6
-
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation 5
-
- Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology 5
- Co-authors
- Cecily KelleherJack McHughKirsten DohertyAnna ClarkeJonathan DrennanAnn SheridanThilo KrollMichelle Butler
- Journals
- The Lancet (2 papers)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)PLoS ONE (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Kate Frazer
54 papers receiving 917 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 37
- Research and Theory 22
- Health 189
- Speech and Hearing 115
- Physiology 346
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Frazer
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Frazer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Frazer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Frazer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Frazer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Frazer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Frazer. The network helps show where Kate Frazer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Frazer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 15 |
About Kate Frazer
Kate Frazer is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and General Health Professions, having authored 64 papers that have together received 959 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (12 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (37 citations), Research and Theory (22 citations) and Health (189 citations). Kate Frazer has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cecily Kelleher, Jack McHugh, Kirsten Doherty, Anna Clarke, Jonathan Drennan, Ann Sheridan, Thilo Kroll, Michelle Butler, Gerard Fealy and Margaret Treacy. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.