Janet M. Phillips

31 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Janet M. Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Education 152
  • General Health Professions 142
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 88
  • Sociology and Political Science 78
  • Emergency Medical Services 75
Replace Gregory A. DeBourgh with:
Gregory A. DeBourgh United States
Kay Hodson Carlton United States
Lynette Stockhausen Australia
Jane Koch Australia
Fátima Pereira Portugal
Yvonne Botma South Africa
Margaret M. Plack United States
Hülya Kaya Türkiye
Heli‐Maria Kuivila Finland
Victoria Pitt Australia
Janet M. Phillips relative to Gregory A. DeBourgh United States Gregory A. DeBourgh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Gregory A. DeBourgh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet M. Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet M. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet M. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet M. Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet M. Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet M. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet M. Phillips. The network helps show where Janet M. Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet M. Phillips

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet M. Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet M. Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet M. Phillips. Janet M. Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 2
3 22
4 2
5 2
6 9
7 27
8 40
9 10
10
Faculty and Pre-Licensure Student Implementation of Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN)
3
11 6
12
Why clinical nurse educators adopt innovative teaching strategies: a pilot study.
23
13 17
14 36
15 105
16
Evaluation of Internet-delivered nursing courses
2
17
Improving Classroom Acoustics (ICA): A Three-Year FM Sound Field Classroom Amplification Study.
57
18 42
19
Counselling and the nurse.
3
20 3

About Janet M. Phillips

Janet M. Phillips is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Research and Theory and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 31 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (7 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (4 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (64 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (43 citations) and Leadership and Management (16 citations). Janet M. Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Mary A. Dolansky, Diane M. Billings, Jeanne S. Ruggiero, Deborah Cullen, Karen Goldschmidt, Kathleen M. Swanson, Celeste R. Phillips, Judith A. Halstead, Patricia K. Bradley and Greg McIntosh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal of Nursing Education and Journal of Professional Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026