Deborah Cullen

47 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers

Deborah Cullen
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Research and Theory 53
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 37
  • Social Psychology 193
  • Education 234
  • General Health Professions 200
Replace Jean Gilmour with:
Jean Gilmour New Zealand
M. Carmen Solano Ruiz Spain
Peggy Anne Field Canada
Hsiang‐Chu Pai Taiwan
Nancy L. Fahrenwald United States
Füsun Terzioğlu Türkiye
Margaret Landers Ireland
Janice M. Parfitt United States
Fintan Sheerin Ireland
Louise McCall Australia
Deborah Cullen relative to Jean Gilmour New Zealand Jean Gilmour's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Jean Gilmour · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Cullen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Cullen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Cullen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Cullen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Cullen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Cullen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Cullen. The network helps show where Deborah Cullen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Cullen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Cullen Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Cullen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20229
2 201835
3 201727
4 20175
5 201520
6
Podcasting as Complement to Graduate Teaching: Does It Accommodate Adult Learning Theories?
201114
7 20115
8 201014
9 201015
10 20099
11 20093
12 20059
13 20031
14 20020
15
Clinical utility of measures of breathlessness.
200236
16
Measures of functional status and quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
19994
17
Do graduate students need mentoring
199846
18 199365
19 19930
20 19921

About Deborah Cullen

Deborah Cullen is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Family Practice, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 53 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mentoring and Academic Development (7 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (4 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (53 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (37 citations), Social Psychology (193 citations), Education (234 citations) and General Health Professions (200 citations). Deborah Cullen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include Gaye Luna, Carol Shieh, Deborah Stiffler, Caitlin Pike, Susan J. Pressler, Susan M. McLennon, Jennifer Schwartz, Janet M. Phillips, Niamh Fitzgerald and Daniel J. Pesut. Their work appears in journals such as Adoption & Fostering, CIN Computers Informatics Nursing, Clinical Nursing Research, Journal of Professional Nursing and Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026