Janet Landman
- General Decision Sciences top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robyn M. DawesJean Denby ManisRoss D. PettyMary WilliamsElizabeth A. VandewaterAbigail J. StewartJanet E. MalleyAndrew S. Halpern
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers)Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers)Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Janet Landman
19 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- General Decision Sciences 419
- Social Psychology 350
- Sociology and Political Science 327
- Applied Psychology 292
- Clinical Psychology 270
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Landman
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Landman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Landman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Landman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Landman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Landman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Landman. The network helps show where Janet Landman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Landman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Landman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Landman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Landman. Janet Landman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | The Confessions of a War Maker and a War Resister | 1 |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | Regret: The Persistence of the Possible | 175 |
| 7 | 166 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 353 | |
| 10 | 107 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 43 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 118 | |
| 16 | 148 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Alternative approaches to the measurement of adaptive behavior. | 7 |
About Janet Landman
Janet Landman is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, General Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (419 citations), Applied Psychology (292 citations) and General Psychology (38 citations). Janet Landman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robyn M. Dawes, Jean Denby Manis, Ross D. Petty, Mary Williams, Elizabeth A. Vandewater, Abigail J. Stewart, Janet E. Malley, Andrew S. Halpern and Larry K. Irvin. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Computers in Human Behavior and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.