Lien B. Pham

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Lien B. Pham is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lien B. Pham has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Applied Psychology and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lien B. Pham's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers). Lien B. Pham is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers). Lien B. Pham collaborates with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Lien B. Pham's co-authors include Shelley E. Taylor, Inna Rivkin, David A. Armor, Keith J. Holyoak, Dan Simon, Teresa E. Seeman and James H. Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Lien B. Pham

9 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regul... 1998 2026 2007 2016 1998 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lien B. Pham United States 8 568 463 441 358 315 9 1.6k
David A. Armor United States 12 743 1.3× 676 1.5× 490 1.1× 622 1.7× 291 0.9× 14 2.1k
Martin F. Davies United Kingdom 18 210 0.4× 541 1.2× 278 0.6× 560 1.6× 266 0.8× 51 1.5k
Igor Gavanski United States 13 334 0.6× 617 1.3× 302 0.7× 531 1.5× 474 1.5× 18 1.7k
Matthew N. McMullen United States 11 414 0.7× 254 0.5× 266 0.6× 291 0.8× 287 0.9× 14 1.1k
Amy Summerville United States 14 381 0.7× 373 0.8× 284 0.6× 326 0.9× 200 0.6× 32 1.1k
Scott Spiegel United States 16 957 1.7× 675 1.5× 283 0.6× 752 2.1× 193 0.6× 17 1.9k
Roman Trötschel Germany 15 582 1.0× 695 1.5× 342 0.8× 899 2.5× 414 1.3× 35 1.9k
Vera Hoorens Belgium 20 479 0.8× 480 1.0× 201 0.5× 602 1.7× 210 0.7× 68 1.4k
Ian R. Newby‐Clark Canada 19 252 0.4× 441 1.0× 369 0.8× 581 1.6× 324 1.0× 37 1.7k
Anja Achtziger Germany 18 590 1.0× 359 0.8× 281 0.6× 376 1.1× 307 1.0× 43 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Lien B. Pham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lien B. Pham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lien B. Pham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lien B. Pham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lien B. Pham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lien B. Pham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lien B. Pham. The network helps show where Lien B. Pham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lien B. Pham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lien B. Pham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lien B. Pham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lien B. Pham. Lien B. Pham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Simon, Dan, et al.. (2001). The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 27(5). 1250–1260. 72 indexed citations
2.
Simon, Dan, et al.. (2001). The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 27(5). 1250–1260. 108 indexed citations
3.
Pham, Lien B., Shelley E. Taylor, & Teresa E. Seeman. (2001). Effects of Environmental Predictability and Personal Mastery on Self-Regulatory and Physiological Processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 27(5). 611–620. 28 indexed citations
4.
Taylor, Shelley E. & Lien B. Pham. (1999). The Effect of Mental Simulation on Goal-Directed Performance. Imagination Cognition and Personality. 18(4). 253–268. 30 indexed citations
5.
Pham, Lien B. & Shelley E. Taylor. (1999). From Thought to Action: Effects of Process-Versus Outcome-Based Mental Simulations on Performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 25(2). 250–260. 311 indexed citations
6.
Taylor, Shelley E., Lien B. Pham, Inna Rivkin, & David A. Armor. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: Mental stimulation, self-regulation, and coping.. American Psychologist. 53(4). 429–439. 445 indexed citations
7.
Taylor, Shelley E., Lien B. Pham, Inna Rivkin, & David A. Armor. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping.. American Psychologist. 53(4). 429–439. 512 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Liu, James H., Lien B. Pham, & Keith J. Holyoak. (1997). Adjusting Social Inferences in Familiar and Unfamiliar Domains: The Generality of Response to Situational Pragmatics. International Journal of Psychology. 32(2). 73–91. 4 indexed citations
9.
Taylor, Shelley E. & Lien B. Pham. (1996). Mental simulation, motivation, and action.. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026