Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups
20061.4k citationsMary Dixon‐Woods, Debbie Cavers et al.BMC Medical Research Methodologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Harvey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Harvey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Harvey more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Harvey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Harvey. The network helps show where Janet Harvey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Harvey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Harvey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Harvey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Harvey. Janet Harvey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hill, Katherine, et al.. (2007). Local Housing Allowance Final Evaluation: The qualitative evidence of claimants’ experience in the nine pathfinder areas. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University).1 indexed citations
6.
Dixon‐Woods, Mary, Debbie Cavers, Shona Agarwal, et al.. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 6(1). 35–35.1419 indexed citations breakdown →
Harvey, Janet & Gary Beauchamp. (2004). ‘What We’re Doing, We Do Musically’. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 33(1). 51–67.3 indexed citations
11.
Harvey, Janet, Andrew Pettigrew, & Ewan Ferlı́e. (2003). The Determinants of Research Group Performance: Towards Mode 2?. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
12.
Bennett, Nigel, Christine Wise, Philip A. Woods, & Janet Harvey. (2003). Distributed Leadership: A Review of Literature. Open Research Online (The Open University).109 indexed citations
13.
Nehl, David B., E. A. B. Aitken, & Janet Harvey. (2002). Genetic Diversity of Thielaviopsis basicola. 1. 685–687.1 indexed citations
Harvey, Janet, John M. Butler, & Richard P. Chartoff. (1988). Development of polyisocyanurate pour foam formulation for space shuttle external tank thermal protection system. Final technical report, March 1986-October 1987. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.