Tina Miller
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Co-authors
- Maxine BirchMary Dixon‐WoodsJonathan A. SmithAndrew BoothBridget YoungAlex J. SuttonDavid R. JonesRachel Shaw
- Topics
- Work-Family Balance Challenges (13 papers)Gender Roles and Identity Studies (10 papers)Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONESocial Science & Medicine
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Tina Miller
47 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
- Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
- General Health Professions 830
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 538
- Clinical Psychology 503
- Gender Studies 498
Countries citing papers authored by Tina Miller
This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Miller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Miller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Miller. The network helps show where Tina Miller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Miller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Miller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Miller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Miller. Tina Miller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | Transition to first-time motherhood. | 7 |
| 12 | 169 | |
| 13 | Public health response to a rabid dog in an animal shelter - North Dakota and Minnesota, 2010. | 2 |
| 14 | 96 | |
| 15 | Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methodsbreakdown → | 446 |
| 16 | 237 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 228 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Tina Miller
Tina Miller is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (13 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (10 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (498 citations), General Health Professions (830 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.3k citations). Tina Miller has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Maxine Birch, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Jonathan A. Smith, Andrew Booth, Bridget Young, Alex J. Sutton, David R. Jones, Rachel Shaw, Sheila Bonas and Melanie Mauthner. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.