Janet E. Frick

1.4k total citations
24 papers, 978 citations indexed

About

Janet E. Frick is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet E. Frick has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 978 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Social Psychology and 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Janet E. Frick's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (6 papers). Janet E. Frick is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (6 papers). Janet E. Frick collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Italy. Janet E. Frick's co-authors include Lauren B. Adamson, John Colombo, Terrill F. Saxon, John E. Richards, Jennifer R. Allen, Elizabeth A. Simpson, Douglas A. Granger, Melissa A. Bright, Jeffrey T. Coldren and Dorothy M. Fragaszy and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Nutrients and Vision Research.

In The Last Decade

Janet E. Frick

24 papers receiving 932 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet E. Frick United States 17 417 381 255 216 186 24 978
Kimberly Cuevas United States 17 535 1.3× 348 0.9× 201 0.8× 315 1.5× 153 0.8× 29 1.1k
Przemysław Tomalski Poland 15 587 1.4× 307 0.8× 130 0.5× 154 0.7× 248 1.3× 47 1.0k
Linda Forssman Sweden 14 282 0.7× 168 0.4× 169 0.7× 165 0.8× 154 0.8× 28 649
Oana Bengà Romania 17 220 0.5× 186 0.5× 191 0.7× 341 1.6× 250 1.3× 60 898
Sammy Perone United States 19 551 1.3× 384 1.0× 120 0.5× 96 0.4× 178 1.0× 39 948
Isaac T. Petersen United States 17 345 0.8× 226 0.6× 137 0.5× 489 2.3× 278 1.5× 44 1.1k
Julia Irwin United States 15 415 1.0× 447 1.2× 79 0.3× 203 0.9× 439 2.4× 34 982
Naseem Choudhury United States 20 901 2.2× 717 1.9× 60 0.2× 138 0.6× 152 0.8× 27 1.5k
Karla Holmboe United Kingdom 17 725 1.7× 271 0.7× 88 0.3× 291 1.3× 117 0.6× 33 1.1k
Kaili Clackson United Kingdom 12 432 1.0× 225 0.6× 275 1.1× 120 0.6× 118 0.6× 21 753

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Frick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Frick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Frick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Frick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Frick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Frick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Frick. The network helps show where Janet E. Frick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet E. Frick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet E. Frick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet E. Frick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet E. Frick. Janet E. Frick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Renzi‐Hammond, Lisa, et al.. (2018). The Macular Carotenoids are Associated with Cognitive Function in Preadolescent Children. Nutrients. 10(2). 193–193. 41 indexed citations
2.
Hammond, Billy R., et al.. (2017). Developmental trends in infant temporal processing speed. Vision Research. 138. 71–77. 6 indexed citations
3.
Simpson, Elizabeth A., Krisztina V. Jakobsen, Dorothy M. Fragaszy, Kazunori Okada, & Janet E. Frick. (2014). The development of facial identity discrimination through learned attention. Developmental Psychobiology. 56(5). 1083–1101. 13 indexed citations
4.
Bright, Melissa A., Douglas A. Granger, & Janet E. Frick. (2011). Do infants show a cortisol awakening response?. Developmental Psychobiology. 54(7). 736–743. 35 indexed citations
5.
Frick, Janet E., et al.. (2010). Developmental changes in inhibition of return from 3 to 6 months of age. Infant Behavior and Development. 33(2). 245–249. 7 indexed citations
6.
Simpson, Elizabeth A., et al.. (2010). Infants Experience Perceptual Narrowing for Nonprimate Faces. Infancy. 16(3). 318–328. 42 indexed citations
7.
Frick, Janet E., et al.. (2003). Cross‐Task Stability in Infant Attention: New Perspectives Using the Still‐Face Procedure. Infancy. 4(4). 567–588. 13 indexed citations
8.
Frick, Janet E. & Lauren B. Adamson. (2003). One Still Face, Many Visions. Infancy. 4(4). 499–501. 4 indexed citations
9.
Adamson, Lauren B. & Janet E. Frick. (2003). The Still Face: A History of a Shared Experimental Paradigm. Infancy. 4(4). 451–473. 285 indexed citations
10.
Frick, Janet E. & John E. Richards. (2001). Individual Differences in Infants' Recognition of Briefly Presented Visual Stimuli. Infancy. 2(3). 331–352. 46 indexed citations
11.
Frick, Janet E., John Colombo, & Jennifer R. Allen. (2000). Temporal Sequence of Global‐Local Processing in 3‐Month‐Old Infants. Infancy. 1(3). 375–386. 43 indexed citations
12.
Maikranz, Julie M., John Colombo, W. Allen Richman, & Janet E. Frick. (2000). Autonomic correlates of individual differences in sensitization and look duration during infancy. Infant Behavior and Development. 23(2). 137–151. 12 indexed citations
13.
Frick, Janet E., John Colombo, & Terrill F. Saxon. (1999). Individual and Developmental Differences in Disengagement of Fixation in Early Infancy. Child Development. 70(3). 537–548. 120 indexed citations
14.
Colombo, John, et al.. (1998). Long- and Short-Looking Infants' Recognition of Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Forms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 71(1). 63–78. 21 indexed citations
15.
Colombo, John, et al.. (1997). Sensitization during Visual Habituation Sequences: Procedural Effects and Individual Differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 67(2). 223–235. 16 indexed citations
16.
Frick, Janet E. & John Colombo. (1996). Individual Differences in Infant Visual Attention: Recognition of Degraded Visual Forms by Four-Month-Olds. Child Development. 67(1). 188–188. 22 indexed citations
17.
Colombo, John, et al.. (1996). Four-month-olds' recognition of complementary-contour forms. Infant Behavior and Development. 19(1). 113–119. 29 indexed citations
18.
Frick, Janet E. & John Colombo. (1996). Individual Differences in Infant Visual Attention: Recognition of Degraded Visual Forms by Four-Month-Olds. Child Development. 67(1). 188–204. 41 indexed citations
19.
Colombo, John, et al.. (1995). Visual pop-out in infants: Evidence for preattentive search in 3- and 4-month-olds. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2(2). 266–268. 40 indexed citations
20.
Colombo, John, et al.. (1995). Individual differences in infant fixation duration: Dominance of global versus local stimulus properties. Cognitive Development. 10(2). 271–285. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026