Janet Drew

400 total citations
12 papers, 263 citations indexed

About

Janet Drew is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Drew has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 263 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Janet Drew's work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers). Janet Drew is often cited by papers focused on Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers). Janet Drew collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Finland. Janet Drew's co-authors include David P. Wacker, Jennifer J. McComas, Linda Cooper, Kimberly Brown, Stephanie Peck, Thomas L. Millard, David M. Richman, Jennifer M. Asmus, Christine Phillips and Christian J. Lueck and has published in prestigious journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and Health Expectations.

In The Last Decade

Janet Drew

9 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet Drew Australia 8 145 127 83 76 56 12 263
R. Schmid Germany 8 67 0.5× 137 1.1× 16 0.2× 60 0.8× 17 0.3× 19 270
Soo Hyun Rhee United States 7 125 0.9× 56 0.4× 17 0.2× 105 1.4× 22 0.4× 10 272
Valentina Sacco United States 15 109 0.8× 126 1.0× 37 0.4× 37 0.5× 25 0.4× 26 395
Neil Martin United Kingdom 9 58 0.4× 166 1.3× 98 1.2× 133 1.8× 12 0.2× 13 292
Gerhard W. Lauth Germany 9 107 0.7× 38 0.3× 63 0.8× 91 1.2× 6 0.1× 43 220
Geneviève Marchand United States 8 23 0.2× 49 0.4× 31 0.4× 39 0.5× 9 0.2× 20 262
Matthew Galvin United States 12 97 0.7× 44 0.3× 10 0.1× 174 2.3× 12 0.2× 30 368
Sydney H. Kinnear United States 4 55 0.4× 178 1.4× 13 0.2× 199 2.6× 16 0.3× 4 285
Corentin J. Gosling France 8 53 0.4× 87 0.7× 35 0.4× 49 0.6× 3 0.1× 30 256
Nicole Bing United States 8 209 1.4× 231 1.8× 5 0.1× 129 1.7× 22 0.4× 9 444

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Drew. The network helps show where Janet Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Drew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Drew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Drew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Drew. Janet Drew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Parkinson, Anne, Richard A. Burns, Geoffrey Herkes, et al.. (2025). Measuring Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: A Rapid Review. Patient. 18(6). 623–644.
3.
Henschke, Adam, Jane Desborough, Anne Parkinson, et al.. (2021). Personalizing Medicine and Technologies to Address the Experiences and Needs of People with Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 11(8). 791–791. 13 indexed citations
5.
Desborough, Jane, Anne Parkinson, Janet Drew, et al.. (2020). ‘It struck at the heart of who I thought I was’: A meta‐synthesis of the qualitative literature examining the experiences of people with multiple sclerosis. Health Expectations. 23(5). 1007–1027. 46 indexed citations
6.
Cooper, Linda, David P. Wacker, Kimberly Brown, et al.. (1999). Use of a Concurrent Operants Paradigm to Evaluate Positive Reinforcers during Treatment of Food Refusal. Behavior Modification. 23(1). 3–40. 25 indexed citations
7.
Derby, K. Mark, et al.. (1995). TWO MEASURES OF PREFERENCE DURING FORCED‐CHOICE ASSESSMENTS. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 28(3). 345–346. 21 indexed citations
8.
Cooper, Linda, David P. Wacker, Jennifer J. McComas, et al.. (1995). USE OF COMPONENT ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY ACTIVE VARIABLES IN TREATMENT PACKAGES FOR CHILDREN WITH FEEDING DISORDERS. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 28(2). 139–153. 103 indexed citations
9.
Millard, Thomas L., David P. Wacker, Linda Cooper, et al.. (1993). A BRIEF COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL TREATMENT PACKAGES IN AN OUTPATIENT CLINIC SETTING WITH YOUNG CHILDREN. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 26(4). 475–476. 9 indexed citations
10.
Drew, Janet. (1962). CONCERNING THE SIDE EFFECTS OF ANTIMALARIAL DRUGS USED IN THE EXTENDED TREATMENT OF RHEUMATIC DISEASE. The Medical Journal of Australia. 2(16). 618–620. 24 indexed citations
11.
Drew, Janet. (1960). A BACKWARD GLANCE AT THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES. The Medical Journal of Australia. 1(3). 87–89. 1 indexed citations
12.
Drew, Janet. (1954). SOME ASPECTS OF PAIN IN CHRONIC RHEUMATIC DISEASE. The Medical Journal of Australia. 2(18). 701–704. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026