Nicole Bing

855 total citations
9 papers, 444 citations indexed

About

Nicole Bing is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicole Bing has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 444 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Physiology and 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Nicole Bing's work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (3 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers). Nicole Bing is often cited by papers focused on Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (3 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers). Nicole Bing collaborates with scholars based in United States and Spain. Nicole Bing's co-authors include Donna S. Murray, Patricia Manning‐Courtney, Suzanne Summer, Laura C. Hart, Bridget Kent, Anna W. Byars, Mustafa Şahin, Deborah A. Pearson, Jamie K. Capal and Paul S. Horn and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders and Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics.

In The Last Decade

Nicole Bing

9 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nicole Bing United States	8	231	209	129	115	68	9	444
Mingji Yi China	12	130 0.6×	98 0.5×	134 1.0×	59 0.5×	42 0.6×	42	443
Jatinder Singh United Kingdom	12	154 0.7×	124 0.6×	109 0.8×	29 0.3×	158 2.3×	38	441
Vanessa Sarkozy Australia	7	288 1.2×	120 0.6×	158 1.2×	35 0.3×	124 1.8×	16	416
Sibelnur Avcıl Türkiye	11	91 0.4×	105 0.5×	83 0.6×	17 0.1×	37 0.5×	21	308
Courtney Wheeler United States	10	197 0.9×	164 0.8×	68 0.5×	10 0.1×	68 1.0×	13	351
Roula Choueiri United States	12	166 0.7×	173 0.8×	92 0.7×	10 0.1×	66 1.0×	20	379
Catherine Doyen France	10	74 0.3×	129 0.6×	184 1.4×	8 0.1×	27 0.4×	32	743
Stewart Rust United Kingdom	12	43 0.2×	61 0.3×	185 1.4×	279 2.4×	46 0.7×	36	512
Eugenia Chan United States	8	72 0.3×	126 0.6×	88 0.7×	13 0.1×	16 0.2×	18	446
Sarah Leone United States	10	680 2.9×	487 2.3×	838 6.5×	13 0.1×	55 0.8×	17	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Nicole Bing

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicole Bing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicole Bing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicole Bing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicole Bing

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicole Bing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicole Bing. The network helps show where Nicole Bing may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicole Bing

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicole Bing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicole Bing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicole Bing. Nicole Bing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Williams, Marian E., Deborah A. Pearson, Jamie K. Capal, et al.. (2019). Impacting development in infants with tuberous sclerosis complex: Multidisciplinary research collaboration.. American Psychologist. 74(3). 356–367. 10 indexed citations

2.

Anixt, Julia S., et al.. (2019). Improving Access to Diagnostic Assessments for Autism Spectrum Disorder Using an Arena Model. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 40(3). 161–169. 7 indexed citations

3.

Mazurek, Micah O., Frances Lu, Heather Symecko, et al.. (2017). A Prospective Study of the Concordance of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 47(9). 2783–2794. 34 indexed citations

4.

Capal, Jamie K., Paul S. Horn, Donna S. Murray, et al.. (2017). Utility of the Autism Observation Scale for Infants in Early Identification of Autism in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. Pediatric Neurology. 75. 80–86. 21 indexed citations

5.

Capal, Jamie K., Paul S. Horn, Donna S. Murray, et al.. (2017). Influence of seizures on early development in tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsy & Behavior. 70(Pt A). 245–252. 118 indexed citations

6.

Manning‐Courtney, Patricia, et al.. (2013). Autism Spectrum Disorders. Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care. 43(1). 2–11. 44 indexed citations

7.

Hart, Laura C., et al.. (2011). Food Variety as a Predictor of Nutritional Status Among Children with Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 42(4). 549–556. 182 indexed citations

8.

Bing, Nicole, et al.. (2009). Comparing the Effects of Amount of Conflict on Children's Adjustment Following Parental Divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 50(3). 159–171. 26 indexed citations

9.

Nelson, W. M., et al.. (2008). Relationship Components and Nature of Postdivorce Parenting Responsibilities Among Individuals Going Through a Divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 49(3-4). 258–271. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact