Health Expectations

2.7k papers and 61.2k indexed citations

About

The 2.7k papers published in Health Expectations in the last decades have received a total of 61.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Expectations usually cover General Health Professions (1.8k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (530 papers) and Clinical Psychology (329 papers) specifically the topics of Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (706 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (646 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (323 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Expectations are Glyn Elwyn, Adrian Edwards, Jonathan Tritter, Sophie Staniszewska, Theresa M. Marteau, Cathy Charles, Elizabeth Dormandy, Zoë Lawrence, Susan Michie and Amiram Gafni.

In The Last Decade

Health Expectations

2.5k papers receiving 59.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Health Expectations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Expectations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Expectations.

Countries where authors publish in Health Expectations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Expectations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Expectations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Expectations more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026