Jane Bourke

39 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers

Jane Bourke
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 50
  • Strategy and Management 70
  • Clinical Psychology 36
  • Economics and Econometrics 33
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 10
Replace Seema Mehta with:
Seema Mehta India
Hudson Pacifico da Silva Canada
S. Kyle Hight United States
Abdul Razak Abdul Hadi Malaysia
Muhammad Bilal Farooq New Zealand
Göran Lindahl Sweden
Ricardo Mora Spain
Christopher J. L. Yewlett United Kingdom
Ririn Noviyanti Putri Indonesia
Antonio Vera Germany
Jane Bourke relative to Seema Mehta India Seema Mehta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Seema Mehta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Bourke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Bourke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Bourke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Bourke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Bourke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Bourke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Bourke. The network helps show where Jane Bourke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Bourke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Bourke Line = papers co-authored together Jane Bourke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201797
2 201348
3 201646
4 201733
5 201523
6 201623
7 201119
8 201619
9 201918
10 201817
11 201917
12 201716
13 201916
14 202014
15 201712
16 202010
17
Factors associated with staffing provision and medical equipment acquisition in Irish general practice.
20139
18 20148
19 20217
20 20227

About Jane Bourke

Jane Bourke is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Strategy and Management, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Psychology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 41 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (1 paper) and Healthcare Systems and Reforms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (50 citations), Strategy and Management (70 citations), Clinical Psychology (36 citations), Economics and Econometrics (33 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (10 citations). Jane Bourke has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Roper, Frank Crowley, Aileen Murphy, Christopher G. Fawsitt, Jennifer E. Lutomski, Richard Anthony Greene, Brendan McElroy, Mary Joyce, James H. Love and Justin Doran. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Innovation Management, Health Policy, Occupational Medicine, Research Policy and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact