Max Kölbel

1.4k citations
30 papers · 720 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 12
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 4
    • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art 3
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 3
    • Philosophy and Theoretical Science 16

Max Kölbel

27 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers

Max Kölbel
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Philosophy 521
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 440
  • History and Philosophy of Science 144
  • Language and Linguistics 110
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 137
Replace Mark Richard with:
Mark Richard United States
Manuel García‐Carpintero Spain
Harold W. Noonan United Kingdom
Jeffrey C. King United States
Carl Ginet United States
Robin Jeshion United States
Alexis Burgess United States
Mitchell S. Green United States
Elizabeth Fricker United States
Kathrin Glüer Sweden
Max Kölbel relative to Mark Richard United States Mark Richard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Mark Richard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Kölbel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Kölbel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Kölbel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Kölbel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Kölbel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Kölbel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Kölbel. The network helps show where Max Kölbel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Max Kölbel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Kölbel Line = papers co-authored together Max Kölbel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004208
2 2002100
3 200398
4 200856
5 200456
6 200829
7 200128
8 200818
9 199816
10 201315
11 200714
12 201311
13 201510
14 20009
15 20159
16 20169
17 20218
18
Arguing About Language
20097
19 19975
20 19975

About Max Kölbel

Max Kölbel is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 30 papers that have together received 720 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (16 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (3 papers) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (521 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (440 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (144 citations), Language and Linguistics (110 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (137 citations). Max Kölbel has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Manuel García‐Carpintero. Their work appears in journals such as Inquiry, Erkenntnis, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Philosophy Compass and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact