James Moore

81 papers receiving 837 citations

Peers

James Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • History and Philosophy of Science 370
  • General Psychology 19
  • History 115
  • Philosophy 110
  • Developmental Biology 15
Replace Elvira Scheich with:
Elvira Scheich Brazil
John M. Staudenmaier United States
Gastón Bachelard France
Roy MacLeod Australia
Jan Goliński United States
Sandra Herbert Australia
Robert J. Richards United States
Barbara Maria Stafford United States
Richard W. Burkhardt United States
Anne Fausto‐Sterling United States
James Moore relative to Elvira Scheich Brazil Elvira Scheich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22×
Elvira Scheich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Moore. The network helps show where James Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Moore Line = papers co-authored together James Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979139
2 1980139
3
Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist
1991128
4 200967
5 197943
6
History, humanity and evolution : essays for John C. Greene
198940
7 198128
8 201227
9 199125
10 198623
11 200921
12 199621
13 197719
14 200619
15 201517
16 198215
17 198015
18 200215
19 201014
20 200613

About James Moore

James Moore is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Architecture, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Science Education (13 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), History of Science and Natural History (4 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (4 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (4 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (370 citations), General Psychology (19 citations), History (115 citations), Philosophy (110 citations) and Developmental Biology (15 citations). James Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Michael Ruse, Adrian Desmond, John C. Greene, Maria D. Avgerinou, Ronald Fernandes, Beth C. Rubin, Josef L. Altholz, Jane Teas, Sarah Blaffer Hrdy and Joseph Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, Equity & Excellence in Education, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education and Urban History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026