This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Urban History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Urban History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urban History more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Urban History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Urban History.
About Urban History
The 946 papers published in Urban History in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Urban History usually cover History (293 papers), Museology (74 papers), Urban Studies (114 papers), Classics (43 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (51 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (248 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (95 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (70 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (61 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (58 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (51 papers), Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (51 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Urban History are David Garrioch, Keith Lilley, Jon Stobart, Julie Rugg, Philip J. Ethington, Peter J. Larkham, Colin G. Pooley, Derek Keene, Philip Howell and Bert De Munck.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.