Anne Fausto‐Sterling
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Anthony CharuvastraEllen LeeJanet SayersLily C. HsiehPhyllis R. BrownChanika PhornphutkulPhilip A. GruppusoScott F. Gilbert
- Topics
- Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (4 papers)Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (4 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaContemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsCzechia
In The Last Decade
Anne Fausto‐Sterling
39 papers receiving 936 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Sociology and Political Science 330
- Molecular Biology 302
- Gender Studies 302
- Social Psychology 270
- Genetics 174
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Fausto‐Sterling
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Fausto‐Sterling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Fausto‐Sterling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Fausto‐Sterling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Fausto‐Sterling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Fausto‐Sterling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Fausto‐Sterling. The network helps show where Anne Fausto‐Sterling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Fausto‐Sterling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Fausto‐Sterling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Fausto‐Sterling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Fausto‐Sterling. Anne Fausto‐Sterling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Building TwoWay Streets: The Case of Feminism and Science | 4 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 161 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | El final programado del dimorfismo sexual | 1 |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 343 | |
| 13 | Sexing the Body | 123 |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Anne Fausto‐Sterling
Anne Fausto‐Sterling is a scholar working on Gender Studies, History and Philosophy of Science and Urology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (4 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (4 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (302 citations), Reproductive Medicine (115 citations) and Social Psychology (270 citations). Anne Fausto‐Sterling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Charuvastra, Ellen Lee, Janet Sayers, Lily C. Hsieh, Phyllis R. Brown, Chanika Phornphutkul, Philip A. Gruppuso, Scott F. Gilbert, Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino. Their work appears in journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.