John M. Staudenmaier
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Education top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Evelyn Fox KellerJames BennettThomas F. GlickArnold ThackrayRobert M. PirsigRonald R. KlineMarcel Chotkowski LaFolletteJoan Rothschild
- Topics
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers)History of Science and Medicine (3 papers)Research, Science, and Academia (2 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal of American HistoryThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John M. Staudenmaier
23 papers receiving 718 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Sociology and Political Science 227
- Education 172
- History and Philosophy of Science 141
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 94
- Information Systems and Management 83
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Staudenmaier
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Staudenmaier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Staudenmaier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Staudenmaier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Staudenmaier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Staudenmaier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Staudenmaier. The network helps show where John M. Staudenmaier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Staudenmaier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Staudenmaier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Staudenmaier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Staudenmaier. John M. Staudenmaier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | HENRY FORD'S BIG FLAW / | 2 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 84 | |
| 19 | A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintockbreakdown → | 601 |
| 20 | 18 |
About John M. Staudenmaier
John M. Staudenmaier is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Computer Science Applications and Museology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers), History of Science and Medicine (3 papers) and Research, Science, and Academia (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (141 citations), General Psychology (24 citations) and Information Systems and Management (83 citations). John M. Staudenmaier has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Evelyn Fox Keller, James Bennett, Thomas F. Glick, Arnold Thackray, Robert M. Pirsig, Ronald R. Kline, Marcel Chotkowski LaFollette, Joan Rothschild, Shoshana Zuboff and Jeffrey L. Meikle. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.