Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Randomized Trial of Methods to Help Clinicians Learn Motivational Interviewing.
2004792 citationsWilliam R. Miller, Carolina E. Yahne et al.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James Martínez
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James Martínez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Martínez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Martínez more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Martínez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Martínez. The network helps show where James Martínez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Martínez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Martínez.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Martínez based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Martínez. James Martínez is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Martínez, James, et al.. (2021). Effects Of A Collaborative, Technology-based Intervention Involving School Principals To Retain Early-career Teachers: A Scaled, Quantitative Research Study. 7(1).1 indexed citations
4.
Martínez, James, et al.. (2020). School Administrator Support of Teachers: A Systematic Review (2000-2019).. 21(1). 230–254.2 indexed citations
Martínez, James. (2017). Mathematics Attitudes and Achievement of U.S. High School Sophomores Based on Race.. 8(1). 17–26.3 indexed citations
8.
Martínez, James, et al.. (2017). Effects Of Human Cadaveric Dissections In High School Biology. Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State. 2(2). 4.2 indexed citations
Martínez, James, et al.. (2014). Effect of Edmark Program on Reading Fluency in Third-Grade Students with Disabilities.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(2). 103–118.4 indexed citations
Martínez, James, et al.. (2014). Effects of Culturally Relevant Teaching on Seventh Grade African American Students. Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State. 1(1). 3.2 indexed citations
Martínez, James, et al.. (2013). Gang Membership Risk Factors for Eighth-Grade Students. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 1–31.4 indexed citations
17.
Martínez, James. (2007). Principal Succession in High Socioeconomic Status Secondary Schools. CSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge).2 indexed citations
18.
West, Thomas G., J. J. Uhl, & James Martínez. (2006). Seeing the unseen. 37–37.1 indexed citations
19.
Miller, William R., Carolina E. Yahne, Theresa B. Moyers, James Martínez, & Matthew Pirritano. (2004). A Randomized Trial of Methods to Help Clinicians Learn Motivational Interviewing.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 72(6). 1050–1062.792 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.