James C. Moore

107 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

James C. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • General Decision Sciences 68
  • General Psychology 19
  • Pharmacy 74
  • Management Science and Operations Research 165
  • Gender Studies 114
Replace Paul Lewis with:
Paul Lewis United Kingdom
Mandeep K. Dhami United Kingdom
Dennis J. Devine United States
Edwin J. Thomas United States
David R. Schmitt United States
Leaetta M. Hough United States
John P. Campbell United States
William Titus United States
Michael J. Zickar United States
Brian P. McCall United States
James C. Moore relative to Paul Lewis United Kingdom Paul Lewis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Paul Lewis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Moore. The network helps show where James C. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James C. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Moore Line = papers co-authored together James C. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976189
2 1968126
3 201398
4 199494
5 198674
6 197869
7 198761
8 201254
9 200652
10 199248
11
Facility familiarity and the home advantage.
199541
12
Spectator effect on team performance in college basketball.
199332
13 201431
14 200730
15 201429
16 196629
17 197329
18 199926
19 197226
20 201325

About James C. Moore

James C. Moore is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 112 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ZnO doping and properties (16 papers), Economic theories and models (15 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (9 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (8 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (8 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers) and Social Power and Status Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (68 citations), General Psychology (19 citations), Pharmacy (74 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (165 citations) and Gender Studies (114 citations). James C. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Iraq. Frequent co-authors include John S. Chipman, Andrew B. Whinston, Robert Rosenthal, Ralph L. Rosnow, A. A. Baski, Louis J. Rubbo, Andrew B. Whinston, H. Morkoç̌, Daniel J. Delaney and H. Raghav Rao. Their work appears in journals such as Computational Economics, Social Psychology Quarterly, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films, International Economic Review and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact