Social Psychology Quarterly

1.3k papers and 75.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 75.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly usually cover Sociology and Political Science (861 papers), Social Psychology (408 papers) and Gender Studies (135 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (415 papers), Social Power and Status Dynamics (200 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (179 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Psychology Quarterly are Peter J. Burke, Jan E. Stets, Richard P. Bagozzi, Glen H. Elder, Corey L. M. Keyes, Sheldon Stryker, Peggy A. Thoits, Peter L. Callero, Philip E. Tetlock and Richard B. Felson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Social Psychology Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Psychology Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Psychology Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025