Jack Barbera

1.6k citations
52 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Barbera

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jack Barbera
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 356
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 222
  • Education 722
  • Chemical Health and Safety 16
  • Safety Research 129
Replace Scott E. Lewis with:
Scott E. Lewis United States
Thomas J. Greenbowe United States
Brian P. Coppola United States
Onno De Jong Netherlands
Muammer Çalık Türkiye
Anne Ruggles Gere United States
Renée S. Cole United States
Vanessa Kind United Kingdom
Brian E. Woolnough United Kingdom
Marilyne Stains United States
Jack Barbera relative to Scott E. Lewis United States Scott E. Lewis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Scott E. Lewis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Barbera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Barbera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Barbera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Barbera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Barbera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Barbera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Barbera. The network helps show where Jack Barbera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Barbera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Barbera Line = papers co-authored together Jack Barbera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008134
2 202079
3 201576
4 201865
5 201662
6 201348
7 201947
8 201345
9 201643
10 202037
11 201932
12 201331
13 201429
14 202026
15 202023
16 202020
17 201919
18 201719
19 201219
20 200519

About Jack Barbera

Jack Barbera is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching Methods (17 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (13 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (12 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (9 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (9 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (9 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (9 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (356 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (222 citations), Education (722 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (16 citations) and Safety Research (129 citations). Jack Barbera has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Regis Komperda, Katherine K. Perkins, Carl Wieman, Wendy K. Adams, Michael M. Phillips, Jennifer E. Lewis, Yujuan Liu, Suazette Reid Mooring, W. C. Lineberger and Richard M. Hyslop. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Chemical Education, Nineteenth-Century Literature, International Journal of Science Education and Modern Drama.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact