Ivi Chakraborty

646 total citations
36 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

Ivi Chakraborty is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science and Biochemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Ivi Chakraborty has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Plant Science, 15 papers in Food Science and 10 papers in Biochemistry. Recurrent topics in Ivi Chakraborty's work include Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (9 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (8 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (7 papers). Ivi Chakraborty is often cited by papers focused on Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (9 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (8 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (7 papers). Ivi Chakraborty collaborates with scholars based in India, Russia and United States. Ivi Chakraborty's co-authors include Arup Chattopadhyay, Mohammed Wasim Siddiqui, R. S. Dhua, J. K. Saha, J. Fernando Ayala‐Zavala, Aman Kumar, Palani Kandasamy, Pranab Hazra, Pradeep Mishra and S. Mitra and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientia Horticulturae, Food & Function and Biosystems Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Ivi Chakraborty

34 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ivi Chakraborty India	13	266	163	79	70	39	36	449
R. S. Dhua India	8	246 0.9×	91 0.6×	92 1.2×	43 0.6×	38 1.0×	52	389
T. K. Roy India	12	252 0.9×	143 0.9×	100 1.3×	95 1.4×	28 0.7×	55	457
Véronique Vidal France	11	206 0.8×	146 0.9×	40 0.5×	75 1.1×	64 1.6×	19	396
H. Kaldmäe Estonia	12	230 0.9×	82 0.5×	149 1.9×	82 1.2×	51 1.3×	47	428
Ana L. Amaro Portugal	14	299 1.1×	186 1.1×	156 2.0×	112 1.6×	66 1.7×	34	555
Tadesse Fikre Teferra Ethiopia	12	180 0.7×	190 1.2×	34 0.4×	76 1.1×	135 3.5×	32	447
Walter Murillo Arango Colombia	9	126 0.5×	112 0.7×	39 0.5×	39 0.6×	57 1.5×	54	319
Pavlos Bouchagier Greece	6	242 0.9×	97 0.6×	82 1.0×	62 0.9×	15 0.4×	15	402
Salah M. Aleid Saudi Arabia	11	307 1.2×	177 1.1×	21 0.3×	50 0.7×	50 1.3×	31	433
Florina Stoica Romania	11	105 0.4×	177 1.1×	90 1.1×	51 0.7×	75 1.9×	28	338

Countries citing papers authored by Ivi Chakraborty

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivi Chakraborty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivi Chakraborty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivi Chakraborty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivi Chakraborty

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivi Chakraborty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivi Chakraborty. The network helps show where Ivi Chakraborty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ivi Chakraborty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ivi Chakraborty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ivi Chakraborty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ivi Chakraborty. Ivi Chakraborty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kumar, Praveen, et al.. (2024). Genetic control of important yield attributing characters predicted through machine learning in segregating generations of interspecific crosses of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 46(8). 5 indexed citations

Hazra, Pranab, et al.. (2022). Diversity of nutrient and nutraceutical contents in the fruits and its relationship to morphological traits in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Scientia Horticulturae. 305. 111414–111414. 17 indexed citations

Chakraborty, Ivi, et al.. (2020). Preparation and evaluation of fruit candy from unripe mango. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 8(1). 2727–2731. 6 indexed citations

Sharangi, Amit Baran, et al.. (2019). Breeding chili pepper for simultaneous improvement in dry fruit yield, fruit quality and leaf curl virus disease tolerance. International Journal of Vegetable Science. 26(5). 457–486. 8 indexed citations

Sarkar, Sukamal, et al.. (2018). Assessment of growth, yield, tuber quality and profitability of potato upon boron fertilization. Journal of Environmental Biology. 39(3). 365–372. 11 indexed citations

Zhimo, V. Yeka, et al.. (2018). Role of Antagonistic Yeast <i>Candida tropicalis</i> YZ27 on Postharvest Life and Quality of Litchi cv. Bombai. Current Science. 114(5). 1100–1100. 5 indexed citations

Banerjee, Hirak, et al.. (2017). Zinc Fertilization in Potato: A Physiological and Bio-chemical Study. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 16(2). 1–13. 4 indexed citations

Chakraborty, Ivi, et al.. (2015). Table wine from tropical fruits utilizing natural yeast isolates. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 53(3). 1663–1669. 12 indexed citations

Siddiqui, Mohammed Wasim, Ivi Chakraborty, Pradeep Mishra, & Pranab Hazra. (2014). Bioactive attributes of tomatoes possessing dg, ogc, and rin genes. Food & Function. 5(5). 936–936. 12 indexed citations

10.

Chakraborty, Ivi, et al.. (2014). A Review of Non-Chemical Alternatives to SO₂Fumigation to Prevent Pericarp Browning of Litchi. International Journal of Fruit Science. 14(2). 205–224. 4 indexed citations

11.

Chakraborty, Ivi, et al.. (2014). Efficacy of various techniques on biochemical characteristics and bitterness of pummelo juice. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 52(9). 6073–6077. 29 indexed citations

12.

Siddiqui, Mohammed Wasim, Ivi Chakraborty, Pradeep Mishra, Pranab Hazra, & J. Fernando Ayala‐Zavala. (2014). Postharvest physicochemical changes in mutant (dg, og c , and rin) and non-mutant tomatoes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 37(1). 4 indexed citations

13.

Chakraborty, Ivi, et al.. (2011). RECENT DEVELOPMENT IN POSTHARVEST PHYSIOLOGY AND STORAGE OF LOQUAT. Acta Horticulturae. 339–343. 5 indexed citations

14.

Chattopadhyay, Arup, et al.. (2011). Crops that feed the world 5. Sweetpotato. Sweetpotatoes for income and food security. Food Security. 3(3). 283–305. 75 indexed citations

15.

Chakraborty, Ivi, et al.. (2011). Value addition of Palmyra palm and studies on the storage life. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 51(4). 768–773. 23 indexed citations

16.

Chakraborty, Ivi, et al.. (2011). POSTHARVEST TECHNOLOGY OF TROPICAL EXPORT PRODUCE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CHALLENGES OF A FUTURE FREE-TRADE WORLD MARKET. Acta Horticulturae. 115–123. 2 indexed citations

17.

Chakraborty, Ivi, et al.. (2010). Quality of diversified value addition from some minor fruits. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 48(6). 750–754. 15 indexed citations

18.

Mitra, S., et al.. (2008). UNDERUTILIZED TROPICAL AND SUBTROPICAL FRUITS OF ASIA. Acta Horticulturae. 67–76. 8 indexed citations

19.

Chakraborty, Ivi, et al.. (2007). Studies on Processing and Nutritional Qualities of Tomato As Influenced By Genotypes and Environment. Vegetable Science. 34(1). 26–31. 9 indexed citations

20.

Chakraborty, Ivi, et al.. (2002). Characterization and Evaluation of Sweet Potato Genetic Resources of West Bengal. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 15(3). 223–226. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact